Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-05-2016, 03:09 PM
 
Location: On the road
2,798 posts, read 2,681,084 times
Reputation: 3192

Advertisements

Background checks may well have prevented injuries, and deaths in the past. We may never really know about what never happened.
Making the process more effective, and enforcing it may prevent more.
If background checks jut prevent ONE child death, it would be worth it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2016, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,143 posts, read 5,814,354 times
Reputation: 7713
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
Background checks may well have prevented injuries, and deaths in the past. We may never really know about what never happened.
Making the process more effective, and enforcing it may prevent more.
If background checks jut prevent ONE child death, it would be worth it.
Would you be willing to return to the national 55 MPH speed limit?
That would save many lives. Guaranteed.
Just "common sense," right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,945,226 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
Background checks may well have prevented injuries, and deaths in the past. We may never really know about what never happened.
Making the process more effective, and enforcing it may prevent more.
If background checks jut prevent ONE child death, it would be worth it.

Yeah Yeah, we know.. "It's about the children". We also know that is bull... If it was "about the children", plastic bags would be regulated. So would swimming pools.. Cars would be further regulated. All of these kill more "children" than do firearms. So please spare us your phony "it's about the children". Just come out and say it. It's about your agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,240,890 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
regardless, total homicides are currently lower than they were when australia had guns.

The gun homicide rate was already decreasing before the gun ban in Australia:

(From the Australian Institute of Criminology)

http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/.../figure_13.png

The decline began in about 1980, long before the ban, and has been going down since then at roughly the same rate over time. Therefore the ban cannot, by itself, take credit for the decline. Better policing and better laws are the mostly likely reason for the decline.

In the US there has been a massive increase over the last 25 years in the number of privately owned firearms. The Left has always argued that more guns equals more gun related murder. But while this massive increase was occurring the gun homicide rate has dropped 49% since 1993:

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware | Pew Research Center
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,240,890 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
Background checks may well have prevented injuries, and deaths in the past. We may never really know about what never happened.
Making the process more effective, and enforcing it may prevent more.
If background checks jut prevent ONE child death, it would be worth it.
Then we'd better ban swimming pools, bicycles, skateboards, minibikes, ATVs and cars.

Every child should be placed in a bubble wrap suit in a 'safe space' at home until they're 18.

If it saves just 1 child... right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,945,226 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
Then we'd better ban swimming pools, bicycles, skateboards, minibikes, ATVs and cars.

Every child should be placed in a bubble wrap suit in a 'safe space' at home until they're 18.

If it saves just 1 child... right?
Ummm.. Can't use bubble wrap.. Suffocation and choking hazard..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 05:06 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,835,194 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Ummm.. Can't use bubble wrap.. Suffocation and choking hazard..
That is irrelevant, bubble wrap cannot be used because it isn't biodegradable.



For all of you who think gun control is an important issue, please review the following chart and find something else to worry about so I, and millions like me, can be left alone without having to worry about you, and people like you, trampling my civil rights. Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,325 posts, read 5,515,418 times
Reputation: 2596
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
Background checks may well have prevented injuries, and deaths in the past. We may never really know about what never happened.
Making the process more effective, and enforcing it may prevent more.
If background checks jut prevent ONE child death, it would be worth it.
People are finally starting to see through the phony "it's for the children" argument of these authoritarian, neo-fascist, control freaks currently in power. The only goal of any attempts at more "gun control" is to dis-arm law-abiding American citizens. Period. It's happened in virtually every dictatorship. It triggered the American Revolution. There is a reason for the 2nd Amendment. It is the last line of defense against a totalitarian government. If you think "the children" are in danger now, wait until there is no one left to shoot back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:34 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,965,958 times
Reputation: 8114
Pay Attention Liberals: Background Checks Would Not Have Stopped Even A Single Recent Mass Shooting



Liberals lack the ability to understand this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 09:25 PM
 
552 posts, read 314,612 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
Then we'd better ban swimming pools, bicycles, skateboards, minibikes, ATVs and cars.

Every child should be placed in a bubble wrap suit in a 'safe space' at home until they're 18.

If it saves just 1 child... right?
Keep the bubble wrap on until they are 26. Children today are way too overprotected. Edward VI was ruling England at 10. Joan of Arc was leading soldiers in battle at 14. Boys and girls once became men and women by 16 because the survival of their family depended on maturity. Coddling kids today is doing them and our society a tremendous disservice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top