U.S. gives immunity to State Dept. staffer who set up Clinton email server

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by OICU812

Don't be dense, the FBI does not go around granting immunity unless they believe a person might be guilty of a crime and they have information which would reveal crucial evidence that a very serious crime was committed by someone else.

Yes, they do extend it to witnesses who are pleading the 5th just for the same of being 100% safe.

[biscuitmom]

Clinton emails continue to be non-scandal, disappointing Republicans

Some salient points:

Clinton set up a personal email account and used it for work.
....................
She may have violated department policies, but there’s no evidence she broke any laws.
....................
None of the work-related emails she sent and received were marked classified at the time.
....................
[To] be charged with mishandling classified information, she would have had to knowingly passed such information to someone not authorized to have it — like David Petraeus showing classified documents to his mistress — or acted with such gross negligence that people without authorization were bound to see it. According to what we know, neither of those things happened.
....................
The FBI is investigating the matter, but has said that Clinton herself is not a target of that investigation, meaning that they don’t suspect that she committed any crime.
......................
Bryan Pagliano has been granted immunity by the Justice Department and is working with them as they complete their investigation, which will probably conclude this spring.

[ringwise]

Originally Posted by odanny

Who cares? We are talking about emails people. Let me repeat this: We are talking about emails.

The best argument conservatives have against Hillary Clinton is she used an unsecured email server.

You can't make this stuff up.

The fact that you don't understand the implications of this speaks volumes.

[stburr91]

Originally Posted by biscuitmom

Clinton emails continue to be non-scandal, disappointing Republicans


Clinton set up a personal email account and used it for work. Which may be deemed illegal. It's likely that at least one of her aids will be prosecuted for it.
....................
She may have violated department policies, but there’s no evidence she broke any laws. There is an open criminal investigation to determine that.
....................
None of the work-related emails she sent and received were marked classified at the time. That has not been determined yet.
....................
[To] be charged with mishandling classified information, she would have had to knowingly passed such information to someone not authorized to have it — like David Petraeus showing classified documents to his mistress — or acted with such gross negligence that people without authorization were bound to see it. According to what we know, neither of those things happened. Which Hillary may have done.
....................
The FBI is investigating the matter, but has said that Clinton herself is not a target of that investigation, meaning that they don’t suspect that she committed any crime. That is not true, it was a White House spokesman that said that, not the FBI.
......................
Bryan Pagliano has been granted immunity by the Justice Department and is working with them as they complete their investigation, which will probably conclude this spring. Which means that a grand jury is either hearing evidence, or is about to hear evidence in for an indictment.

Some salient points:

My comment are in red.