Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You might also be interested in googling Victoria Nuland (Asst Secretary of State for Europe) and Geoffrey Pyatt (US Ambassador to Ukraine) caught on tape discussing who they intended to lead the new government months before the coup. It's pretty clear they were plotting againt the former president and what happened in Ukraine was not organic. The drama in the Ukraine is all about US power brokers stealing the gas and oil from Russian power brokers.
Who cares? We are talking about emails people. Let me repeat this: We are talking about emails.
The best argument conservatives have against Hillary Clinton is she used an unsecured email server.
You can't make this stuff up.
Emails? You are are right. People where I work have been fired for simply sending an email from the company server because it had a questionable joke. She knew the policies and ignored them. She has a long history of ignoring inconvenient policies, rules and laws.
Why is it acceptable for underlings to be held accountable but not Hillary?
A general lost his career over emails.
If she can follow policies and guidelines, then how can she be Commander in Chief? A good leader should be the role model for desired behaviors. If you can't follow rules then you are not fit to lead.
Who cares? We are talking about emails people. Let me repeat this: We are talking about emails.
The best argument conservatives have against Hillary Clinton is she used an unsecured email server.
You can't make this stuff up.
You do realize that what they did was exactly what the engineers in Iran did when they were infected with Stuxnet. It's like the origination was an email or thumb drive and from that point on it transferred from machine to machine through networks and/or thumb drives.
It was just a code albeit a rather awesome and technical code meant for one purpose only.
The thing is that he was the witness, not the accused, and he pleaded the 5th to eliminate any possibility of someone twisting his words to incriminate him. So, now he has immunity, so he can say anything he wants without any possibility of being incriminated for anything. It is called "witness immunity".
It's called qualified immunity and it usually applies to POs but also extends to government officials in the executive branch.
Will the Democrats stop to consider the fact that Hillary's former IT guy has to get immunity from the FBI before he can even talk about her activities? Sounds like he worked for the Mafia.
No, because there is no such thing as criminal activity to a Democrat. Anything goes. Laws are meaningless guidelines for others.
Who cares? We are talking about emails people. Let me repeat this: We are talking about emails.
The best argument conservatives have against Hillary Clinton is she used an unsecured email server.
You can't make this stuff up.
No, we are talking about highly classified information on an unsecure server... a massive security violation if there ever was one. but go ahead and keep your head in the sand.
My first language is not English but you may be able to help me. Did I understand the law incorrectly or laws mean jack squat when come to politicians?
d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
...
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Add to that, there are also Bernie Sanders supporters all throughout the democrat party who despise Hilary, and are only too happy to destroy her campaign to get their guy elected.
Honesty and integrity in a politician like Sanders? Can't have that I guess
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
