Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

If women don't want politicians 'invading their vaginas' and passing odious laws restricting services, there is a simple solution -- VOTE! If 80% of those eligible to vote, voted in midterm elections, instead of 25%, we wouldn't have these Neanderthals in the state houses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:17 PM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
If women don't want politicians 'invading their vaginas' and passing odious laws restricting services, there is a simple solution -- VOTE! If 80% of those eligible to vote, voted in midterm elections, instead of 25%, we wouldn't have these Neanderthals in the state houses.
If you don't want politicians - or anyone else - invading your vaginas, act responsibly, be self-controlled, and handle your own affairs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
If you don't want politicians - or anyone else - invading your vaginas, act responsibly, be self-controlled, and handle your own affairs.
Behold the conservative solution, above.

That "solution" does nothing to provide needed medical care that women need. It's the solution that people who really don't care about other people propose. That's why it's important for women to be a voting block and oust people like Rick Scott and John Kasich from their governorships. Kasich also defunded PP in Ohio -- so his presidential bid as a 'moderate' cannot be believed.

Samantha Bee really hands Kasich his head.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6y_AeJXUdM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:37 PM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Behold the conservative solution, above.

That "solution" does nothing to provide needed medical care that women need. It's the solution that people who really don't care about other people propose. That's why it's important for women to be a voting block and oust people like Rick Scott and John Kasich from their governorships. Kasich also defunded PP in Ohio -- so his presidential bid as a 'moderate' cannot be believed.

I do not want to pay for abortions. I do not include abortions with medical care.

The funding for medical care has not been touched - and continues as it has been in the past.

Why don't you direct your complaints to PP - and tell them to adjust so they can continue to give appropriate medical care to women who need it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I do not want to pay for abortions. I do not include abortions with medical care.

The funding for medical care has not been touched - and continues as it has been in the past.

Why don't you direct your complaints to PP - and tell them to adjust so they can continue to give appropriate medical care to women who need it?
Under current law, you are not paying for abortions since no federal program provides reimbursement for abortions. Thus, you got your wish.

Planned Parenthood provides 93% of other services that aren't abortion. Those services are reimbursed by insurance and federal and state programs (for those that can't are eligible.) What those who want to exclude Planned Parenthood from ANY reimbursement are trying to do is stop all services so PP can't exist and provide abortions -- damned the fact that women will have no access to other facilities. This is not only cruel but heartless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:48 PM
 
18,401 posts, read 19,031,744 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I do not want to pay for abortions. I do not include abortions with medical care.

The funding for medical care has not been touched - and continues as it has been in the past.

Why don't you direct your complaints to PP - and tell them to adjust so they can continue to give appropriate medical care to women who need it?
your tax dollars are not used for abortions. none of us get a choice on how are tax dollars are spent except when we use our vote and even then all of us pay for something we don't support. be it people with no children still pay taxes for schools. people who will never set foot in a national forest still pay taxes for it.

while you might not include abortion with a "medical service" does not mean it isn't a medical service, you need to be a doctor, it's a medical service.

there is no reason for PP to "adjust" anything they do, it is all legal. there is no need to change just to pacify the conservatives. as pointed out in this thread some conservatives don't want abortions, don't want to pay for welfare and want to eliminate WIC and section 8. talk about being penny wise and pound foolish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:00 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,652,910 times
Reputation: 13169
You know, when men can get pregnant and have babies, then and ONLY then should they have a say.

Ever notice that the people protesting at PP or an 'abortion clinic' are 90% male?

Why is that?

Last edited by Fox Terrier; 03-28-2016 at 02:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:00 PM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Under current law, you are not paying for abortions since no federal program provides reimbursement for abortions. Thus, you got your wish.

Planned Parenthood provides 93% of other services that aren't abortion. Those services are reimbursed by insurance and federal and state programs (for those that can't are eligible.) What those who want to exclude Planned Parenthood from ANY reimbursement are trying to do is stop all services so PP can't exist and provide abortions -- damned the fact that women will have no access to other facilities. This is not only cruel but heartless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
your tax dollars are not used for abortions. none of us get a choice on how are tax dollars are spent except when we use our vote and even then all of us pay for something we don't support. be it people with no children still pay taxes for schools. people who will never set foot in a national forest still pay taxes for it.

while you might not include abortion with a "medical service" does not mean it isn't a medical service, you need to be a doctor, it's a medical service.

there is no reason for PP to "adjust" anything they do, it is all legal. there is no need to change just to pacify the conservatives. as pointed out in this thread some conservatives don't want abortions, don't want to pay for welfare and want to eliminate WIC and section 8. talk about being penny wise and pound foolish.

You guys need to read up on your ObamaCare information.

If what you said is true, there would be no need for the legislation in Florida.

Notice that this type of legislation has surfaced after ObamaCare was enacted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:08 PM
 
18,401 posts, read 19,031,744 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
You guys need to read up on your ObamaCare information.

If what you said is true, there would be no need for the legislation in Florida.

Notice that this type of legislation has surfaced after ObamaCare was enacted.
Obamacare is affordable access to health insurance. this "type" of legislation trying to block access to abortion has been happening long before Obamacare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:09 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,652,910 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
You guys need to read up on your ObamaCare information.

If what you said is true, there would be no need for the legislation in Florida.

Notice that this type of legislation has surfaced after ObamaCare was enacted.
Has nothing to do with the ACA.



Also, there IS NO NEED for the legislation in Florida. Glad you agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top