Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you want to back up your claim, you will need to post evidence of this happening. I don't live in California, so I don't have any interest in what their laws say.
1. Since we don't have such refined ability to prevent all dangerous people from walking outside of prison or hospitals, we can at least conduct background checks and prevent them from owning the most dangerous weapons.
2. People are murdering others without guns, but the point is that they murder a lot more people in a shorter amount of time with guns.
Opposing background checks just because you can't weed out 100% of dangerous people 100% of the time is the definition of stupid. Your strawman argument does not stand up to common sense.
Makes you wonder how this country ever survived 200+ years without requiring background checks?
Wasn't that long ago that you could order a rifle from Sears catalog and have it delivered to your door, no questions asked.
Yet somehow people who did that managed to not go around shooting up schools or night clubs.
So what"s changed?
The weapons haven't changed significantly in 100 years...,
No more statutory laws of men, would work.
Natural laws and natural liberties will still be in existence, because they are not made by men to rule over other men.
Makes you wonder how this country ever survived 200+ years without requiring background checks?
Wasn't that long ago that you could order a rifle from Sears catalog and have it delivered to your door, no questions asked.
That is how I bought my Winchester Rifleman 30-30 when I was 9 yo., from the money I made mowing grass in the neighborhood. Came with a box of cartridges. That box was gone in 10 minutes.
That is the rifle I kept in my truck, going to school.
Still have that rifle. It rides on the ATV.
No more statutory laws of men, would work.
Natural laws and natural liberties will still be in existence, because they are not made by men to rule over other men.
Read a history book bro. Who determines and enforces these natural rights?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
