Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2016, 07:51 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,117,869 times
Reputation: 8252

Advertisements

After begging the Do-Nothing GOP Congress to fund the fight against Zika, Obama just sidestepped them.

Obama sidesteps deadlocked Congress to fund Zika fight

Quote:
On Thursday night, the Obama administration informed Congress that it has transferred $81 million within the Health and Human Services Department to finance anti-Zika virus efforts, with $34 million heading to a National Institutes of Health program to support ongoing development of a Zika virus and $47 million slotted to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) for related Zika preparedness. The money will come from funds set aside for biomedical research on cancer and other ailments, as well as programs to help poor families pay for heating oil and substance abuse programs.
No doubt the conservatives will now portray Obama as hitler for sidestepping the Do-Nothing GOP Congress on this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2016, 08:08 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,631,426 times
Reputation: 22232
Yes, let's fight Zika. Let's use the most effective tool - DDT.

The EPA took seven months to hold hearings where they went over reports, data and studies and listened to expert testimony on DDT. The final report issued by the EPA committee that was in charge of this in depth review said that DDT was a relatively safe and effective means to control mosquitos and the disease they transmit with minimal impact to the environment. The director of the EPA, who chose not to attend the meetings and supposedly didn't read the report, effectively banned DDT.

If Obama was serious about Zika, he would have the EPA objectively review that report and reverse, or at least relax, the ban on DDT.

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/public...-silent-spring

Last edited by PedroMartinez; 08-12-2016 at 09:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Paradise
4,876 posts, read 4,209,844 times
Reputation: 7715
Republicans sent a proposal first and the Democrats refused it (they didn't like where the funds were coming from).


Both repubs and dems are to blame for the stalemate.




Zika Funding: Republicans and Democrats Play Chicken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
After begging the Do-Nothing GOP Congress to fund the fight against Zika, Obama just sidestepped them.

Obama sidesteps deadlocked Congress to fund Zika fight



No doubt the conservatives will now portray Obama as hitler for sidestepping the Do-Nothing GOP Congress on this one.
actually its the dems that have been the obstructionists on this

there is money already set aside for ebola...but the dems refuse to use it for zika

23 June 2016--The House voted early Thursday to approve a bill to provide $1.1 billion to combat the Zika virus, but Democrats vowed to derail the legislation in the Senate

29 June 2016--Efforts to combat the Zika virus stalled in the Senate Tuesday when Democrats blocked a $1.1 billion House-passed funding bill, escalating the political battle between the parties over how to respond to the looming public health crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
Maybe the Republicans figure a Zika epidemic will cut down on the number of future Democrats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 09:50 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,769 posts, read 40,184,340 times
Reputation: 18106
Quote:
On Thursday night, the Obama administration informed Congress that it has transferred $81 million within the Health and Human Services Department to finance anti-Zika virus efforts, with $34 million heading to a National Institutes of Health program to support ongoing development of a Zika virus and $47 million slotted to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) for related Zika preparedness. The money will come from funds set aside for biomedical research on cancer and other ailments, as well as programs to help poor families pay for heating oil and substance abuse programs.
Who decided that we needed to spend $81 million on the Zika problem? How will the money be spent? That's a lot of money. And many times, more money spent quickly doesn't mean a faster successful end result.

It's like the high cost of an ER visit. Those doctors and nurses are already working the shift. Then how much is the patient being charged for bandages and other supplies?

As a conservative, I'd want details and an accurate breakdown of the costs before just writing a check for $81 million towards Zika research. And countries like Brazil where the problem is much bigger should also be tapped for funding a cure,

Why should America be stuck with the entire bill for solving the Zika virus? It's not America's job to solve all of the planet's problems. And we also can't afford to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Paradise
4,876 posts, read 4,209,844 times
Reputation: 7715
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
Who decided that we needed to spend $81 million on the Zika problem?

Obama originally asked for $1.9 billion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:04 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,769 posts, read 40,184,340 times
Reputation: 18106
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
Obama originally asked for $1.9 billion
IMO that's way too much money. And how exactly was that going to be spent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Alabama
956 posts, read 745,592 times
Reputation: 1492
Let's see, it was Ebola not long ago, the Swine Flu, etc..... Just another way for government to take our money and spend it on OTHER things. What a racket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,840 posts, read 24,359,728 times
Reputation: 32973
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Yes, let's fight Zika. Let's use the most effective tool - DDT.

The EPA took seven months to hold hearings where they went over reports, data and studies and listened to expert testimony on DDT. The final report issued by the EPA committee that was in charge of this in depth review said that DDT was a relatively safe and effective means to control mosquitos and the disease they transmit with minimal impact to the environment. The director of the EPA, who chose not to attend the meetings and supposedly didn't read the report, effectively banned DDT.

If Obama was serious about Zika, he would have the EPA objectively review that report and reverse, or at least relax, the ban on DDT.

The Truth About DDT and Silent Spring - The New Atlantis
Anyone who advocates widespread DDT use is condemning hundreds of thousands -- including the unborn -- to a myriad of illness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top