Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The problem isn't that they're "successful", it's that they are largely part of the problem Trump said he was going to fix. They are going to maintain the Wall Street status quo because why wouldn't they?
We love them because they all are good at what they do, and for the jobs they will have. What did you want, a bunch of losers that Hillary would have picked? Like the Commie Bernie? Nah, wasn't going to happen. We aren't ready to become the United Socialist States of America. Thats why you lost.
Should Trump have picked people whose only success has been career politicians? Should he have picked people who have achieved nothing in life? How about a Van Jones? I wonder if he was part of the Solyndra deal? My point is I would rather have high powered successful people than activists whose agenda isn't in our best interests.
Should Trump have picked people whose only success has been career politicians? Should he have picked people who have achieved nothing in life? How about a Van Jones? I wonder if he was part of the Solyndra deal? My point is I would rather have high powered successful people than activists whose agenda isn't in our best interests.
One thing is for sure. The United States didn't care to see who Hillary would pick in her cabinet, that's why she lost.
How does wealth automatically disqualify one from doing a job?
FDR's picks were also stacked and picked the biggest stock market con-man to head the SEC.
Thats the "New" way of thinking. If your a "Commie" you don't want anyone who has more than you do, or you believe some of that wealth should be yours, even if you didn't earn it.
Should Trump have picked people whose only success has been career politicians? Should he have picked people who have achieved nothing in life? How about a Van Jones? I wonder if he was part of the Solyndra deal? My point is I would rather have high powered successful people than activists whose agenda isn't in our best interests.
Do you honestly think these billionaires' interests are aligned with yours? Honestly? Their success and wealth are predicated on keeping working and middle class people down and squeezing them out of existence. It's all about the money, and you're a fool if you think otherwise.
Not difficult at all. Trump is picking folks that know how to prosper, and how to make us prosperous, unlike Hillary, who only knew how to make money off her job, for herself. What part of that didn't you understand? If your going to lead a Country, you need capable Leaders.
But tell me how they are going to make us prosper. What is their plan for the middle class. And just because you are rich doesn't mean you are a capable leader. What does Carson know about HUD....nothing. Rick Perry will be energy secretary, an agency he wanted to scrap. But now he loves it lol Trump is still in celebrity apprentice mode.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
