Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Judith:[on Stan's desire to be a mother] Here! I've got an idea: Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb - which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans' - but that he can have the "right" to have babies.
Francis: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother... sister, sorry.
Reg: What's the point?
Francis: What?
Reg: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies, when he can't have babies?
Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Reg: It's symbolic of his struggle against reality. - exchange from "Life of Brian"
But men have always had babies. Those men are called 'fathers'. If you mean, can a man carry a baby inside his body, no, not yet he can't. (I'm sure it's being worked on though, somewhere in the world.) But there are women who can't carry babies in their bodies either, and yet it's now common for them to become biological mothers.
Reading your literal words and not trying to guess your meaning is being obtuse? ok.
So, you also believe that a person, born a man, who has had complete gender reassignment surgery (no dangler) should also use the men's room?
Nope he's cut off from the mens room. It's called MR Happy for a reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckOfMs
How about people born with ambiguous genitalia?
Ambiguous genitalia. What does that mean?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.