Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you think he was right by refusing to get off, what is your logic for saying he was wrong when he ran back on the plane? That doesn't make sense to me.
Then you are not thinking very hard.
He was right to stand his ground on being deplaned. But once he was removed, the thing to do was go get medical help and a lawyer to help you collect your 6 figure retirement fund, not go back past security and start the scene over again.
Yeah I asked the same question. In fact most of those she/he is disagreeing with are hard core liberals!
And who they might be? Please list them.
If you pay a little attention you will know who is liberal and who is not. I see some from the right and I am glad they see it too. But please show me what you claim.
Payment is irrelevant. Authorized agents for the owner of the property exercised their right to ask him to leave. Payment of a fare does not confer ownership of any asset. His options after an alleged breach of contract would be legal only. And would not include initiating violence by blockade and endangering the lives of passengers by exposing them to armed personnel dealing with his brainless screeching hysteria in a crowded airplane. In an era of almost daily Islamic terror where order in public spaces is critical and people must behave in a rational and docile fashion in order to promote safety for all.
What a load of horse puckey. The guy sitting in his seat is endangering the lives of others?
Man, you really have been conditioned to be a good little sheeple when you so ardently defend this.
AFTER their stock dropped and people were calling for his ouster and a world wide boycott. No motivation there...
Well yeah.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64
This thread has gotten so long that I don't even want to read it anymore. I have seen every possible argument on both sides, and I still think it is absolutely and utterly wrong for airlines to overbook. (Yeah, yeah, I know...this wasn't overbooking, it was to make room for employees. Even worse.)
The one thing I will say is that every single person who has spoken in defense of United is practically inviting airlines to go on treating them and every other passenger like crap. Why not just slap a big, fat "kick me" sign on your back?
Srsly! God forbid the airlines actually start to think about their customers for a change!
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash
What a load of horse puckey. The guy sitting in his seat is endangering the lives of others?
Man, you really have been conditioned to be a good little sheeple when you so ardently defend this.
The airline didn't drag anyone anywhere. You seem to be uninformed about the facts, and I'm sure you really don't want to rest an argument on that.
What? The airline brought the security on board and authorized them to act. When they did so violently the airline did nothing to stop them.
Holy cow, what fricking video are you watching?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
