Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The context was an enhanced Police presence and not to be alarmed about it ( the presence of Police).
khan is a failure and has failed the people of London
Quote:
LONDON Mayor Sadiq Khan has been ridiculed as a hypocrite after he failed to acknowledge sanctions on Israeli travellers - despite criticising Donald Trump’s so-called Muslim ban.
an attack happens in London, and what does khan do...he blames the PM
then he states it "just part of city living"
Quote:
Terror attacks are part of living in big city, says London Mayor Sadiq Khan
and Khan isn't innocent in the twitter world either:
Quote:
Trump's ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe. It risks alienating mainstream Muslims. London has proved him wrong
— Mayor of London (@MayorofLondon) May 10, 2016
Scotland Yard figures released last month showed a 42% rise in gun crime and a 24% increase in knife crime in the capital (London)
You deliberately cut off the rest of that quote so it would say what you wanted it to say, rather than what the full quote actually did say.
Your lie is easily seen by everyone here. Whether you choose to own it or not does not change that reality.
People are dead and injured from a terrorist attack. Do you really think those people need to be told not to be alarmed just because there is heavy policy presents?
I never mentioned your name, but if the shoe fits...
Devious dismissal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
Anyway, you have had your hand held, you have been carefully guided to the tweets in question and you've presumably read the thread, so are you going to comment on the Tweets and the controversy they've caused?
Evidence of the previous comment to be a devious dismissal.
Comment? Sure...
1. I do not think the president should be getting into these quarrels.
2. The London Mayor is a Muslim sympathizer and approves of the killings. You people would understand this if you paid attention to the actions of the "esteem professionals" in Libya. He is a radical, he approves, which is why all of his actions will be mild objections and policies that continue the killing.
This is what you progressives want here in the US.
Better gear up, because we won't act like the peasants of Europe.
The mayor of London was trying to calm his citizens down after a terrorist event.
I should add that like others I think the "Don't be alarmed." statement was meant about the additional police. But let's just say he really was misguided and meant "Don't be alarmed by these murdering terrorists running amok," is it really the time for anyone, let alone the President of America, to start trolling him (really al of London) on Twitter?
People are dead and injured from a terrorist attack. Do you really think those people need to be told not to be alarmed just because there is heavy policy presents?
The job of the mayor is to calm his citizens in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. You really can't understand something that basic?
"Someone who prefers pretty pictures to words". Yeah, that pretty much describes Windows 10.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.