Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
her initial claim was that cohen violated the terms of the NDA by discussing it with the media. if that's the case then i believe she would be able to keep the money.
whether she does/doesn't is kind of a moot point since this has opened up a bigger can of worms concerning campaign fund violations.
Yep. The Trump-Stormy agreement is on the public domain. Reading it show that this was not an agreement between Cohen and Daniels with no knowledge of Trump.
So how does trump defend against this? He said that they never had a relationship, was never aware of this NDA move by Cohen, and the he didn't need it anyway? So, why not consent to release her if she clearly has nothing true to say?
It's been a pattern for the rest of his life, he has never expressed any kind of remorse for said pattern, so it is entirely possible. I don't really care WHERE it happens, I'm more concerned about how it reflects on the character of the person. Just like the pattern of turning friends into enemies reflects on the character of the person. And I'm no fan of Clinton so spare me the whataboutisms I am sure you are thinking about while you read this.
So far... there are charges for non-Trump related incidents, supposed "false" statements which actually may or may not be false depending on the context of the questions and/or answers, and charges announced against 13 Russians for non-Trump-related election tampering that will never see the light of day in a US court because the US doesn't have an extradition treaty with Russia.
Carter Page didn't do anything illegal, so why would the FISC grant multiple successive surveillance warrants with him as the subject?
Release the FISA warrant applications. Let's see how dirty this really gets...
It's been a pattern for the rest of his life, he has never expressed any kind of remorse for said pattern, so it is entirely possible. I don't really care WHERE it happens, I'm more concerned about how it reflects on the character of the person. And I'm no fan of Clinton so spare me the whataboutisms I am sure you are thinking about while you read this.
When you commit adultery in PUBLIC OFFICE, and in the OVAL OFFICE you open yourself up for blackmail from foreign powers. Therefore he put the country at RISK. Ever play Chess?
When you commit adultery in PUBLIC OFFICE, and in the OVAL OFFICE you open yourself up for blackmail from foreign powers. Therefore he put the country at RISK. Ever play Chess?
Well, according to the events unfolding RIGHT NOW IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES: When you commit adultery outside of public office, you ALSO OPEN YOURSELF UP TO BLACKMAIL be it from the prostitute you slept with or any other sources who know about it, therefore he STILL PUTS THE COUNTRY AT RISK.
I was rated 2200 in chess when I was 16 years old, that is not grand master level but it is reasonably high, though I probably couldn't maintain the same level now. Yes, I have played a lot of chess.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
