Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
of course, not even close. But there are substantially more criminals as a percentage of the black population than of the white population in the United States. That's not a subjective comment, it's factual and statistically relevant when explaining the higher number of police interactions with blacks
We have already established in this thread that Stephon was facing the police when they fired. Video evidence proves that. Stephon was a father and was unarmed at the time they fired but he had been committing crimes. ran from the police, and was reported by two separate individuals that he was armed.
As to your other assertion: Not that long ago? Was it yesterday? Last month? Last year? Was it in your lifetime? Bad people exist. Not all police are bad. It was not "standard police procedure" to kill black men and rape their women and young girls. Nor would I assume it is standard black man procedure to kill white men, rape their women and young girls but it happens during home invasions. Criminal activity is criminal activity no matter if they wear a fancy blue uniform or not.
Take a screenshot that shows him facing police before he was shot?
Show a video of him smashing windows?
let's just keep it real here on both sides - there is no doubt he was the guy smashing windows (plus he had a long criminal record) and there is no doubt he was shot in the back by the newbie cops (6-7 times per autopsy report)
According to the autopsy, he was shot mostly in the back. It took him 10 minutes to die. He didn't have a gun, he wasn't facing the officers when they opened fire. Not a righteous shoot in any sense of the word.
According to the autopsy, he was shot mostly in the back. It took him 10 minutes to die. He didn't have a gun, he wasn't facing the officers when they opened fire. Not a righteous shoot in any sense of the word.
This shooting had a bad smell to me right off the bat. But I waited for more information to come in before saying it was a bad shooting. Now with the autopsy results I'm convinced that this was a bad shooting.
let's just keep it real here on both sides - there is no doubt he was the guy smashing windows (plus he had a long criminal record) and there is no doubt he was shot in the back by the newbie cops (6-7 times per autopsy report)
Source? Last thing I heard the authorities were still describing him as a suspect. And it would appear things like the tool he purportedly used to break windows has not been found.
Source? Last thing I heard the authorities were still describing him as a suspect. And it would appear things like the tool he purportedly used to break windows has not been found.
And then you wonder why nobody has any respect for the BLM collective....
WE have established no such thing.
YOU have kept repeating it.
Take a screenshot that shows him facing police before he was shot?
Show a video of him smashing windows?
We already did this in this thread. Go back and read the thread. The video conclusively shows that he was facing the police. He took a step, turned to the left, and fell to his knees as they were shooting. You are right, most of the shots then hit him in the back. One shot hit him in the front and turned him.
We already did this in this thread. Go back and read the thread. The video conclusively shows that he was facing the police. He took a step, turned to the left, and fell to his knees as they were shooting. You are right, most of the shots then hit him in the back. One shot hit him in the front and turned him.
Nope. No shot hit him in the front. One shot hit him in the side from the rear. And that shot may have turned him further. But no shot from the front. The only one that may have hit in the front is the leg wound which happened when he was fully or partially down.
Nope. No shot hit him in the front. One shot hit him in the side from the rear. And that shot may have turned him further. But no shot from the front. The only one that may have hit in the front is the leg wound which happened when he was fully or partially down.
If you watch the helicopter video, he falls down and to his left. His right side/back is towards the police. The only way he could have entrance wounds on the left side of his legs and torso is if those hit him while he was still standing. (Shot 7 & 8 in the image above)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
