Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There was an attack a couple years back. It turned out that Assad did cause it. His forces bombed an insurgent stronghold which the insurgents were using to manufacture and store chemical weapons. Uh, oops. Sure, Assad's forces caused it but not on purpose.
Thank heavens we had our strong President Obama, who delivered on his promise about crossing the red line, or it would be so much worse for these poor people.
Meh -- careful now -- Trump is on record urging Obama to do nothing in Syria. Sure today he's changed his mind but he didn't support action at the time (what did the Republican party encourage Obama to do at that time -- can't remember).
Anyone else think it's odd that every time America talks about leaving Syria or softening its stance on Assad, there ends up being a chemical attack? And supposedly it's Assad who is ordering these attacks. If he's the one ordering them, why would he time them like this? And he also always seems to use the chemicals on the wee children, for maximum outrage. Does he want America there? Does he want the US funding his enemies and kicking his ass militarily? It doesn't make sense.
Of course it doesn't make sense.
But that doesn't stop the brainwashed zombies from soaking it up.
A sheeple doesn't need common sense, they just need a Communist, Zionist, Rothschild puppet (see Western Politician or the controlled media for two of the main sources) to tell them what to think and what's going on.
The Israels have a right to have a border, and to defend it. Israel does not have to allow a mass march into its territory, however "peaceful." The marchers have no right to be there. And the march is not so peaceful. You don't toast over Molotov cocktails.
Well, in response to your title - Trump IS tweeting about it. So that should fix it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
Assad has denied doing this. Demanding he had no part in it, condemning it.
Well then if Assad DENIED it . . . surely it must be true.
Anyone that thinks Assad is the one responsible for these chemical attacks isn't "the best and the brightest".
Then who's doing it?
Why have "they" blocked off the current war zone east of Damascus in Eastern Ghouta, and what are they hiding, and who exactly are "they"?
They better not be the Syrian army.
It seems overly cute that they would do this almost one year to the day from the attack last year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
Because it is a false flag. Assad nor Putin have anything to do with this, nor the last one, they got Tomahawked over.
There is no reason what so ever, for Assad to do this in the Capital city. Nothing strategic.
It is done to oust Assad. More CIA meddling. Show the children... Show the children....
Assad has denied doing this. Demanding he had no part in it, condemning it.
You'd better be wrong.
Our CIA gasses children? So tell me about the Twin Towers...
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill
Meh -- careful now -- Trump is on record urging Obama to do nothing in Syria. Sure today he's changed his mind but he didn't support action at the time (what did the Republican party encourage Obama to do at that time -- can't remember).
Golly gee, if the U.S. government said Assad did it then it must be true.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No Western Outrage . . . .
