Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fifty people killed in attack on night club, and we hear "it is not the gun". Forty people killed in gas attack in war zone and we hear "oh my god, how horrible those weapons are, they should not use them".
Fifty people killed in attack on night club, and we hear "it is not the gun". Forty people killed in gas attack in war zone and we hear "oh my god, how horrible those weapons are, they should not use them".
Do you have a point here?
Have you not learned about a thing called WWI?
The last 70 years the international community has said no to chemical weapons.
We don't even have a body count yet.
This is nothing to joke or laugh about.
Easy for us to sit on our couches and pontificate about.
This better not be really happening.
59 Tomahawk missiles won't suffice here. We need about 7 or more countries to bomb airfields here.
Anyone else think it's odd that every time America talks about leaving Syria or softening its stance on Assad, there ends up being a chemical attack? And supposedly it's Assad who is ordering these attacks. If he's the one ordering them, why would he time them like this? And he also always seems to use the chemicals on the wee children, for maximum outrage. Does he want America there? Does he want the US funding his enemies and kicking his ass militarily? It doesn't make sense.
Well, people won't follow logic to its ultimate result. The only source of the attack until now is the white helmets, a uk sponsored "humanitarian" army. We are supposed to believe the syrian army has used chemical weapon when they are wining and exterminated almost all terrorists. Of course it doesn't make sense.
A chemical attack on civilians and lot of pictures and videos of children dying is an excuse for more military intervention. It is not assad who wants more wars, it is terrorists groups armed and financed by the west that have been beaten thanks to russian and iranian support of syria. This will more than likely be used to justify more troops, and strikes against syria (a chances for trump to look presidential). The news channels loves when missiles are launched to another country.
Well, in response to your title - Trump IS tweeting about it. So that should fix it.
Well then if Assad DENIED it . . . surely it must be true.
Bay of Tonken...
It is a NWO deep state maneuver. They want war with Russia so badly, because they won't play the game.
A One World Government, will stoop to evil to make it happen on an illusion.
GW & Cheney, killed over 3000 Americans to get us balls deep into the Middle East. Look at us now, Trillions of dollars lighter, into their buddies pockets.
Anyone else think it's odd that every time America talks about leaving Syria or softening its stance on Assad, there ends up being a chemical attack? And supposedly it's Assad who is ordering these attacks. If he's the one ordering them, why would he time them like this? And he also always seems to use the chemicals on the wee children, for maximum outrage. Does he want America there? Does he want the US funding his enemies and kicking his ass militarily? It doesn't make sense.
59 Tomahawk missiles won't suffice here. We need about 7 or more countries to bomb airfields here.
Or what, tough guy? Do you plan on heading over there--on your own dime--and doing something about it?
"We" don't need to do anything. $21 trillion in debt and a crashing petrodollar will make sure of that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.