Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What a bunch of nonsense. This specific topic has been given enough examples to bury even the most hardcore skeptic. At this point you are WAY beyond that. You are in denial.
What a bunch of nonsense. This specific topic has been given enough examples to bury even the most hardcore skeptic. At this point you are WAY beyond that. You are in denial.
There have been threads with literally hundreds of posts detailing the "how".
The fact that people still ask "SHOW ME HOW THEY DID IT!" is a bit sad at this point.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reads2MUCH
Actually, I don't think Trump's story about this meeting has changed in any way. As I remember this story being reported, Don Jr admitted that the original reason he took this meeting was he was told he would be receiving some sort of damning information about Hillary Clinton. However, the claim is when he actually took the meeting, the woman offered no such information, and instead was discussing this whole adoption thing. And Trump has maintained throughout that he did not know about the meeting beforehand. So while I won't say the president has never told a lie, in this instance he doesn't appear to be lying or changing his story. It's pretty much the same story that was told way back when this was news. The only thing new is him saying it's "totally legal" which of course it is.
You people know about the tactics used by the Clinton campaign against Trump, don't you? Do you honestly believe the Clinton campaign acted honorably? Do you honestly not understand that both sides engaged in less than honorable, albeit legal tactics to try to win that election? For me, one of the biggest problems is Democrats inability to admit that their side engaged in the same dirty tactics that the Republicans did to try to win that election. I'm sorry that the end result left your candidate on the losing end, but that doesn't change the fact that both parties are one and same when it comes to what they are willing to do to try and win an election. And pretending the Democrats are somehow the more "honorable" or "honest" party is absolutely disingenuous.
And pretending Trump is 'honorable' or 'honest' is YUGELY disingenuous!
Please tell us how ANY Russian used ANY method to change ANY vote in ANY of the 30 individual states where Trump beat Hillary Clinton.
I thought so.
(remember, you first posted it)
It doesn't matter if a vote was actually changed, they still interfered.
If you attempt to robe a bank but don't actually take any money, guess what!? You're still getting charged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats
The Russians know the Clinton's are corrupt be happy neither are back in the White House.As for those with TDS get over it you will have 6 more years of "The Donald" like it or not.
Why would Russia care if the Clintons are corrupt? Hint: they don't.
Russia was more concerned with knowing Hillary is actually tough on them. They much rather have the girl scout who handles them with white gloves.
Having a meeting with a lobbyist where gathering dirt is discussed on a political opponent is not illegal. Neither is lying about it. Trump's not under oath. Sorry libs, you'll just have to accept it someday.
Having a meeting with a lobbyist where gathering dirt is discussed on a political opponent is not illegal. Neither is lying about it. Trump's not under oath. Sorry libs, you'll just have to accept it someday.
What lobbyist was that?
I thought Don Jr. met with a Russian (foreign adversary) official who had ties to the Kremlin. Once that person said, via email, they had "dirt" it should have been turned over to the FBI. The crime was embracing the foreign adversary for political gain.
Now, maybe we are talking about two different meetings.
Having a meeting with a lobbyist where gathering dirt is discussed on a political opponent is not illegal. Neither is lying about it. Trump's not under oath. Sorry libs, you'll just have to accept it someday.
Actually meeting with the representative of a FOREIGN government to get dirt on your opponent is in fact illegal. It is a crime.
Sorry Repubs, you'll just have to accept it someday
Having a meeting with a lobbyist where gathering dirt is discussed on a political opponent is not illegal. Neither is lying about it. Trump's not under oath. Sorry libs, you'll just have to accept it someday.
Money laundering is without question and unambiguously illegal...so the rest will take a back seat anyway. This is why Putin owns Trump and has him on a short leash.
btw...
It is illegal to solicit, accept or receive contributions and donations ― including things of value such as opposition research ― from foreign nationals.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
