Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can tell the election is over.
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell called for the confiscation of semi-automatic rifles in a USA Today oped on Friday.
Swalwell wants taxpayers to foot the bill using 15 billion of taxpayer dollars to do it.
You have to be incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest to think that snipped tweet forwarded from "Rambobiggs" said anything about nuking anyone who resists.
How unhinged are right wing gun nuts anyway? Spend more time reading real books and less guns and ammo.
Looks like the congressman tried to have a respectful conversation with a crackpot loser gun fetishist who thinks he scored a "gotcha".
having that with someone who is pro gun control aka bans is near impossible. Hundreds of threads of us trying to tell facts to those that support gun control but in the end they still parrot buzz words and slogans created by gun control groups and politicians.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,358,694 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by dman72
You have to be incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest to think that snipped tweet forwarded from "Rambobiggs" said anything about nuking anyone who resists.
How unhinged are right wing gun nuts anyway? Spend more time reading real books and less guns and ammo.
Looks like the congressman tried to have a respectful conversation with a crackpot loser gun fetishist who thinks he scored a "gotcha".
Or to believe the cited article claims Swalwell called for confiscation which it does not. While it may be a silly plan, there's quite a difference between a buyback and possible prosecution and confiscation but I guess confiscation is just a far better fear-mongering word, actually used or just thrown out for melodramatic affect.
Or to believe the cited article claims Swalwell called for confiscation which it does not. While it may be a silly plan, there's quite a difference between a buyback and possible prosecution and confiscation but I guess confiscation is just a far better fear-mongering word, actually used or just thrown out for melodramatic affect.
I don't know, a mandatory buyback sounds like confiscation. Just a play on semantics.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.