Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, it proves people pretend they dont understand context.
This forum has the exact same argument every day about people claiming they would overthrow the government, and others remind them that the government would likely win.
Is that like the times everyone thought the mighty US would win easily in Vietnam, Afghanistan? LOL
This is a Aussie idea and if I remember correctly they gave gun owners 600 bucks. So not only did they buyback/confiscate they ripped everyone off. I do not have lots of money but I do have guns worth over 600 bucks.
He's soooooo generous. He'll give you $1,000. Still won't cover the cost of many a "military-style assault weapon".
He's soooooo generous. He'll give you $1,000. Still won't cover the cost of many a "military-style assault weapon".
I make my own for $250-$350 depending on options.
An M-16 trigger group is easy to make, if you have the tools.
Or you can buy one and install it yourself in your AR lower, for as little as $50.
Here is one for $75.
Mandatory GUN BUY BACKS are Confiscation, and BANS. That's exactly what Hillary was advocating. First of all the government can't buy back my guns. They never gave them to me in the first place. What he is advocating is giving arbitrary compensation for private property that I LEGALLY BOUGHT to FORCIBLY take them away. That is TYRANNY. Pure, and simple.
You have to be incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest to think that snipped tweet forwarded from "Rambobiggs" said anything about nuking anyone who resists.
How unhinged are right wing gun nuts anyway? Spend more time reading real books and less guns and ammo.
Looks like the congressman tried to have a respectful conversation with a crackpot loser gun fetishist who thinks he scored a "gotcha".
It's Eric Swalwell who said that the war would be short because the government has nuclear weapons.
That's a loony statement, and provocative.
I'm not a "right wing gun nut"- I don't have a gun and I'm not a Republican.
You and 3 of your buddies deciding to rebel are not equal to Vietnam.
Maybe you don't get out much and led a sheltered life. Try "you and 10,000,000 of your buddies." There is a reason Americans own 300,000,000 firearms. And they aren't all for duck hunting....
I know at this time this congressman's proposal won't get anywhere. HOWEVER if the democrats had a liberal president in office and controlled congress NO DOUBT they would pass a similar law, though they probably wouldn't offer so much money to buy back.
Is there any democrat on here that is going to dispute that? You know it's true.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
