Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-17-2019, 10:17 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,294,796 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Good to see your racism out in the open. Always best to know what one is dealing with. As repulsive as it is.
Shame your buddies, who are black and is the only reason you like them, can't dominate two parent families and stop neglecting their children. How about you stop marketing welfare?
Which of my buddies has neglected their children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2019, 10:18 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,989 posts, read 9,708,363 times
Reputation: 10440
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Yes, I totally agree with you. Many, if not all, of the most vocal and upfront "Christians" on this forum are also many of the most spiteful, hateful people who post here. I've long observed that so many people use their "faith" as a security blanket to hate others who are different.
That is true, but everybody who proclaim to be a Christian is anything but a Christian. Fake Christians as I call them. You just can't be mean and hateful and expect to walk right into Heaven, it don't work like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 10:48 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,351,625 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You don't ever get to tell me what to do. Which is what you were against a few posts ago. The hypocritical thought process you have here is laughable.
I am speaking for the truth. Make something else up.
You can't speak the truth about something you don't understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,409 posts, read 26,381,149 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"You do know he turned down an offer to continue playing early on, right?"

He started his little childish game AFTER he was benched because he became ineffective as the quarterback for the team.

Np other team wanted him AFTER he showed he cold NOT be effective.
He turned down a $7M offer from Denver in 2016 while he was still under contract with SF for $12M, tough decision LOL. You might want to ask the question why none of the other 20 teams in the NFL saw fit to give him an offer for the next 2 years, everyone was solid at quarterback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 01:28 PM
 
2,359 posts, read 1,039,535 times
Reputation: 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post


He turned down a $7M offer from Denver in 2016 while he was still under contract with SF for $12M, tough decision LOL. You might want to ask the question why none of the other 20 teams in the NFL saw fit to give him an offer for the next 2 years, everyone was solid at quarterback.

But 2016 was the last year of his contract in SF, having opted out of the final year. He should have been looking to 2017, when a $7 million contract would have been far better than what he actually got, which was nothing. Judging from his on-the-field results in the final year of his contract in SF, Kaepernick was comically overpaid at $12 million. The 49ers probably could have gotten more bang for the buck if they had sprung Ryan Leaf from prison and made him the starter.

His unwillingness to accept a valid offer from Denver exemplifies Mr. Kaepernick's poor decision-making skills, which no doubt played a part in every other team taking a pass on him. That is, if his declining QB play, his annoying tendency to become a locker-room headache, and his self-serving, publicity-seeking SJW posturing hadn't already been enough. (And they most assuredly were.)

Let face the facts: No professional football franchise wants a QB who can't make good decisions, either on the field or in everyday life. Kaepernick's poor decision-making was the reason he never played after the end of the 2016 season. And that's why I find it difficult to believe that the NFL rewarded Kaepernick's astounding personal stupidity with a reported $60 to $80 million settlement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Bronx, New York
4,437 posts, read 7,691,403 times
Reputation: 2054
Quote:
Originally Posted by scatman View Post
Regardless of whether, on the field, he could still muster, it was obvious that the NFL thought Kaep was bad for business. And it wanted to do everything to get rid of him. The reported amount of the settlement, if accurate, speaks volumes.

I doubted whether Kaep would play in the NFL, again. My doubts still stand.
With what I said, the kneeling was a social justice issue. The aftermath was that of labor and business.....

Kaep won his labor/collusion dispute, with an award up to $80 million. Add to that the $30 million from Nike, and he's sitting on up to a cool $110 million.

The NFL got rid of someone who they thought was a headache for their business! That's how the NFL rolls, whether one likes that or not. Look at how it deals with off-field incidents. It makes its ruling, and changes up once public backlash starts. (See Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson and Josh Gordon). And Kaep was the biggest headache of them all, because much of it's supporting fans of the NFL business (the ones who pay for them PSL's as well as regular seats) are flag-loving conservatives.

For Kaep opponents: Kaep is gone. Enough of the hate. Time to keep it moving......!

For Kaep supporters: Folk want see Kaep on the field as a symbolic gesture. To see him behind center, while folk put their fist in the air in pride. But Kaep got his money; a lot of money. Time to keep it moving.....!

For Kaep: A 31 yo, QB, out two and a half years, in a quickly changing pro game, sitting on up to $110 million. Would it not be a good time to chill with his dollar bills, instead of getting hurt at his age.......and to keep it moving?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,577,492 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milton Miteybad View Post
Let face the facts: No professional football franchise wants a QB who can't make good decisions, either on the field or in everyday life. Kaepernick's poor decision-making was the reason he never played after the end of the 2016 season. And that's why I find it difficult to believe that the NFL rewarded Kaepernick's astounding personal stupidity with a reported $60 to $80 million settlement.
They didn't "reward" anything, Kap's legal team would have had access to emails between the league office and owners which would have shown collusion, and not only would the NFL have lost this lawsuit against them, they would have gotten even more bad publicity and been exposed for the douchebags that Goodell and the owners have shown themselves to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 04:25 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,201 posts, read 9,127,025 times
Reputation: 13959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"but he's better, right now, than 50% of the rostered QB's in the NFL."

Says YOU!

You DO know a NEW football league just started and OFFERED him a contract and he turned it DOWN. Why don't YOU get a team and offer him a contract? Or are you just another " do as I say", type and will EVER put your OWN skin in the game?

With "all" the people supporting him, getting the money shouldn't be an issue! I'd bet a LOT of the EXISTING players who knelt with him would give you some money.

"Put or SHUT" as they say!

If is so good, why didn't ANY TEAM TAKE HIM?

We hear on here ALL the time business owners ONLY care about the money. WINNING brings in fans which which BRINGS IN TV and the MONEY!

"Do players not have the right to refuse employment or must they sign any contract offered to them?"

If he REALLY wanted to play and it was the ONLY contract offered, YES, you take the contact and PROVE you are better. THEN you can ask for MORE MONEY.

He CAN'T TURN DOWN A CONTRACT then claim nobody will take him.

Or it all just about the money and NOT whether he can play or not?
The Ravens had an offer in the works but his girlfriend Nessa (Handler) destroyed that opportunity for him.

The new football league offered him a contact and he countered with a $20 million contract request. The players on that new league are not making anything north of $250K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 04:26 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,201 posts, read 9,127,025 times
Reputation: 13959
Quote:
Originally Posted by scatman View Post
With what I said, the kneeling was a social justice issue. The aftermath was that of labor and business.....

Kaep won his labor/collusion dispute, with an award up to $80 million. Add to that the $30 million from Nike, and he's sitting on up to a cool $110 million.

The NFL got rid of someone who they thought was a headache for their business! That's how the NFL rolls, whether one likes that or not. Look at how it deals with off-field incidents. It makes its ruling, and changes up once public backlash starts. (See Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson and Josh Gordon). And Kaep was the biggest headache of them all, because much of it's supporting fans of the NFL business (the ones who pay for them PSL's as well as regular seats) are flag-loving conservatives.

For Kaep opponents: Kaep is gone. Enough of the hate. Time to keep it moving......!

For Kaep supporters: Folk want see Kaep on the field as a symbolic gesture. To see him behind center, while folk put their fist in the air in pride. But Kaep got his money; a lot of money. Time to keep it moving.....!

For Kaep: A 31 yo, QB, out two and a half years, in a quickly changing pro game, sitting on up to $110 million. Would it not be a good time to chill with his dollar bills, instead of getting hurt at his age.......and to keep it moving?
His lawyers will take a nice chunk from that $60 to $80 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2019, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Bronx, New York
4,437 posts, read 7,691,403 times
Reputation: 2054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ryu View Post
His lawyers will take a nice chunk from that $60 to $80 million.
Standard is 1/3. So, that means around $20-35+ million.....!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top