Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I said she's a polar bear scientist..and she is....a scientist is someone that studies something
..does she study polar bears?...absolutely
Now rather that attack her title...which is lame....show where her science is wrong
They CANNOT and they WILL NOT because... "the science is settled" and "scientific consensus".
Even the once useful idiots of CAGW/CACC are becoming less useful at running resistance to the science coming out daily. Science which refutes the claims of their religious leaders.
I still argue that one need look no further than the email communications between the principal drivers of the CAGW/CACC scare to see the willful collusion and intent to defraud to push their political narrative. It's not even a scientific narrative, it's 100% political.
The Left has to LIE to advanced their agenda. Always.
So you pretty strongly feel that we're far better off paying for the destruction of global warning as it comes, if it's real, than taking a chance by paying billion$ in taxes and prohibitive regulations to stop it, which may end up proving unnecessary? Indeed, it may beyond mankind's ability to stop any perceived undesired climate changes.
Man made global warming...…..just another scam from the loonies.Can you say "carbon tax" on everything that runs?
If global warming and it's massive damages come about, I'll look forward to you quite strongly insisting that the taxpayers should not be held responsible for it in any way to clean it up and restore.
fairy tale...
No matter who's numbers you believe...polar bears are at a record high
....ice went down....polar bear population went up...that's fact
The only people not celebrating the great polar bear recovery are the hypochondriac bed wetters
Either somebody lied to you, or you just made that up......Sorry, but it's not a fact....Bear populations are increasing in two small areas, decreasing in one larger area and stable in several others....In most of the rest their range there in not enough info.
Either somebody lied to you, or you just made that up......Sorry, but it's not a fact....Bear populations are increasing in two small areas, decreasing in one larger area and stable in several others....In most of the rest their range there in not enough info.
Okay, here's something interesting I didn't know. There's some argument in the Hudson Bay area about the number of polar bears that are allowed to be harvested (hunted). Some Inuit say the increased number of attacks on humans by polar bears is an indication that there are too many bear (despite the population decreasing slightly in recent years). Then you have environmental groups who are critical of the Canadian government for not decreasing the number of bears that are allowed to be harvested because the numbers of bears are declining. Towns have had to implement various methods to deter bears, including moving them to other locations.
So how much of the population decline in that specific area is due to ice loss? We do know that that has an impact. But how many are removed and placed elsewhere, and how many are hunted? Do we know whether those numbers are included or removed when the total population for the area is counted?
So this article appeared in the (snicker, heh heh) No Tricks Zone website, eh?
Which do I believe? Studies published in Nature or Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society that man-made climate change is proven and happening now, or do I believe what the climate deniers put out in the (ahem) No Tricks Zone?
LOL.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.