Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-29-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Camberville
15,859 posts, read 21,431,910 times
Reputation: 28199

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Very clearly, he's not because he said the mother/family gets to decide if the born alive baby gets resuscitated when allowed to lie there and die ...or not. Choosing to deliberately withhold medical care from a born alive infant which results in the death of the infant is infanticide.

Thank G-d you have never had to experience the loss of a newborn who was incompatible with life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:00 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,245,191 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Very clearly, he's not because he said the mother/family gets to decide if the born alive baby gets resuscitated when allowed to lie there and die ...or not. Choosing to deliberately withhold medical care from a born alive infant which results in the death of the infant is infanticide.
No. It's not if the infant is going to die anyway.

That was what was being addressed.

We do this all the time with people who are in hospitals on respirators and in vegetative states.

And, that was what he was addressing. Choosing not to continue care in an infant who is not going to survive. Not allowing one to die that is healthy.

How silly to try to make it about something like that.

Could he have been clearer? I guess he didn't think he needed to spell out that he was not in favor of actual infanticide because anyone with common sense would know this already.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:05 PM
 
17,183 posts, read 22,907,200 times
Reputation: 17478
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Northam, an MD, says that's exactly what happens.
No, that is not what he said.

https://wtkr.com/2019/01/30/video-of...on-goes-viral/

Quote:
Northam's office later said he was only referring to a circumstance like a "nonviable pregnancy or in the event of severe fetal abnormalities."
Losing such an infant is a terrible event, but he was not talking about babies who could live with the right treatment, he was talking about babies who have a condition that does not allow them to survive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:25 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,368,826 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Let's see, Brought to Us by the same people who brought us Russiagate.

  • MSN to NPCs -> "Trump is Crazy"
  • NPCs -> "Trump is Crazy", "Orange Man Bad"
Not one word from you on what Trump actually said in context. Just parroting opinion from the leftist rag.

Or from you! Just parroting opinion from the 'Donny Good' crowd!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:29 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,983 posts, read 44,793,389 times
Reputation: 13687
Quote:
Originally Posted by nana053 View Post
No, that is not what he said.
Yes, it's exactly what he said. No medical treatment is given to a born alive baby if the mother/family chooses to let the baby die. That's infanticide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:31 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,368,826 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
"The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired"

Actually, he did say they would not provide medical care and let the baby die if that's what the mother/family wanted. Potato, Potahto.

What Northam described is infanticide.

Actually he was talking of non-viable fetuses but why let context interfere with Trump's continual lying nonsense, eh?


https://www.politifact.com/virginia/...would-execute/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:32 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,983 posts, read 44,793,389 times
Reputation: 13687
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
No. It's not if the infant is going to die anyway.

That was what was being addressed.
So, WHY withhold medical treatment if, supposedly, "the infant is going to die anyway?" Provide the medical treatment until the baby dies despite being administered medical care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,039,578 times
Reputation: 22091
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
So, WHY withhold medical treatment if, supposedly, "the infant is going to die anyway?" Provide the medical treatment until the baby dies despite being administered medical care.
Why? Because prolonging its life would amount to torture.

Why are you in favor of prolonging suffering?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:43 PM
 
17,183 posts, read 22,907,200 times
Reputation: 17478
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
So, WHY withhold medical treatment if, supposedly, "the infant is going to die anyway?" Provide the medical treatment until the baby dies despite being administered medical care.
Nonviable pregnancies are a different kind of problem.

https://www.verywellfamily.com/viabl...bility-2371666

Quote:

From a diagnostic perspective, nonviable does not mean a little chance but no chance of survival. There are a number of common reasons for this. Among them:

Molar pregnancy in which a fertilized egg incapable of survival implants in the uterus
Ectopic pregnancy in which the fertilized egg implants outside of the uterus
Chemical pregnancy in which an egg is fertilized but never implants in the uterus
Anembryonic gestation, also known as a blighted ovum, in which the pregnancy stops growing after the gestational sac forms
A pregnancy in which the baby no longer has a heartbeat
A congenital defect which makes survival impossible
Being born too prematurely to be able to survive


In terms of premature birth, most hospitals in the United States look at viability from the perspective of when a preemie has at least some chance of surviving. Technically speaking, the line is drawn roughly around the 24th week of gestation.
A nonviable pregnancy is a pregnancy without a chance of a live infant being born or without the fetus having a chance to survive if born alive. Chromosomal abnormalities are the most common causes of miscarriage. These abnormalities result in a non-viable embryo and ultimately a pregnancy loss
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2019, 04:44 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,118,610 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
So, WHY withhold medical treatment if, supposedly, "the infant is going to die anyway?" Provide the medical treatment until the baby dies despite being administered medical care.
They are given hospice style treatment as the parents are given bereavement support. As it should be.
Quote:
As a NICU nurse, I served on the "Bereavement Team." We were a special team of Nurses…

We placed the babies skin to skin with mom and placed a blanket over them both. We lowered the lights and quieted the room. We had as much or as little family and the parents wanted in the room. We sang songs, we prayed, we hugged, we swayed... and we all cried.

We put a lock of hair into a ribbon. We measured the babies length and marked it on a tape measure. We made special tiny white gowns and hats for our angels. We created a memory box for these families who were losing their child that day

So yes, there are those in hospitals who are around infants who pass: they are the Bereavement Teams & they provide the equivalent of neonatal hospice to families who are living through absolute Hell.

Babies and children die, it’s a sad part of life. But no one, absolutely NO ONE ever, in any hospital, nor any mother who has just given birth, is conspiring with a doctor on whether or not to commit infanticide. This is perhaps one of the sickest accusations levied by this deranged dictator yet. Don’t believe a word he says about anything important.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...690484737.html

Last edited by sickofnyc; 04-29-2019 at 04:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top