Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's an opinion. He's the attorney general. Perhaps when the Special Counsel says we don't have enough evidence to exonerate, the AG should dig deeper. Real good work there by the AG.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Fair enough. I will restate: AG Barr may have read the report, but given his reaction to the question, he appears to have an incredibly selective memory, which is strange because this is an event mentioned multiple times in the report about Trump's campaign manager, an event that occurred while he was Trump's campaign manager, an event that was literally referenced in the table of contents of the report.
Can I ask your personal opinion? Do you believe it's a significant event that a presidential candidate's campaign manager shared polling data Konstantin Kilimnik (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantin_Kilimnik), who has ties to the GRU? What if Hillary's campaign manager had done the same thing? Do you know what the GRU is?
"Perhaps when the Special Counsel says we don't have enough evidence to exonerate, the AG should dig deeper. Real good work there by the AG"
It WAS the Special Counsels JOB to investigate the issue. It was UP TO THEM to do the investigations and come up with the evidence or NO evidences to support an indictment.
The way I read your post, why should we have had a Special Counsel in the 1st place IF " the AG should dig deeper."?
Did you HEAR ALL the tools Mueller had? the number of HILLARY lawyers on is team, UNLIMITED amount of TIME and money, the number of interviews, documents etc.?
That was some debacle yesterday, I see that Trump finally has the right guy the question is why would he trash what was left of his reputation. The GOP went back to attacking the FBI and bringing up Clinton yet again as if that was the focus of the hearing, Pretty sad moment for the country, history isn't going to put the republicans in a positive light, it doesn't matter what this administration does they will bless it.
Yeah, because the only ones that can attack institutions are the Democrats when it’s a republican administration.
It’s a sad moment how Democrats play politics....they have the full report, stop with the drama and roll the dice and impeached if that’s what they feel. The won’t, this is about politics.
Has Mueller come out and said anything about the phone conversation being incorrect?
Mueller has made no public statement on the phone call, which we learned about like 24 hours ago. He makes rare public statements. He did memorialize his thoughts on Barr's memo, which contradicts Barr's assertions about the phone call. Barr told Richard Blumenthal he will not share the notes taken regarding Mueller's phone call.
It's so strange how some people here how people keep taking Barr's baseless assertions as fact. If Mueller comes under oath to Congress and publicly contradicts his own letter, I will take him at his word.
The Dems have secure rooms of their own—
Why won’t Barr provide one?
Because he doesn’t want it out of HIS control...
He might want to edit it again...
Your posts makes no sense.
A secure room has been provided where both parties can go review the unredacted report.
The report has been published.
There is no editing as much as you Trump haters would like to change the results.
Since the report and the Mueller summaries speak for themselves you might want to ask the necessity for Barr to put out his own version and hold a hearing prior to the release. He wanted to make sure he got his spin out there and was even able to work in spying on the campaign.
No, they don’t speak for themselves. Mueller needs to go to the senate under oath and answer questions about his report. It’s a 1 sided report that hasn’t been cross examined.
That's an opinion. He's the attorney general. Perhaps when the Special Counsel says we don't have enough evidence to exonerate, the AG should dig deeper. Real good work there by the AG.
"Perhaps when the Special Counsel says we don't have enough evidence to exonerate, the AG should dig deeper. Real good work there by the AG"
It WAS the Special Counsels JOB to investigate the issue. It was UP TO THEM to do the investigations and come up with the evidence or NO evidences to support an indictment.
The way I read your post, why should we have had a Special Counsel in the 1st place IF " the AG should dig deeper."?
Did you HEAR ALL the tools Mueller had? the number of HILLARY lawyers on is team, UNLIMITED amount of TIME and money, the number of interviews, documents etc.?
Give it UP!
He did investigate. He basically said we'd indict on obstruction except DOJ policy says you can't indict a sitting president. This is in the report. Barr has already made public his opinion on indicting a sitting president, so he wasn't going to do something that Barr was already saying he could not do. So he did not charge.
"Russian intelligence officers contacted Trump campaign members, telling them that they had dirt on Clinton."
hillary PAID for "dirt" on Trump obtained through ""Russian intelligence" and "eagerly" passed it to the obama run CIA, FDoJ and FBI, hence the FISA warrants.
"Would Trump voters here on City-Data have a problem if Joe Biden's campaign employees accepted dirt from Russian Intel officers that would hurt Trump in the election?"
You spend your time on "what if" INSTEAD of what ACTUALLY happened.
Why HAVEN'T ANY hillary supporter, which INCLUDES the LSM, shown a problem with THAT?
HYPOCRITES to the CORE!
^^^great Post!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
