Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The problem is that this list is about "protecting democracy". Obviously a partisan hack job. How many attorneys on this list are lining up to take on the case of obstruction? Oh wait, they're all "former" law makers.
Yeah, and their professional opinions as prosecutors mean nothing. LOL. You guys are really something else.
Yeah, and their professional opinions as prosecutors mean nothing. LOL. You guys are really something else.
Not really, not when politics are involved. That's like saying that all the ex-Republican lawmakers in the Senate are for impeaching Hillary for wiping her hard drives.
Yeah, and their professional opinions as prosecutors mean nothing. LOL. You guys are really something else.
"prosecutors" Did you actually bother to read that list? It was a list of 370 out of 100s of 1000s of former "prosecutors". WaPo used that term to describe anyone involved in legal matters.
Not really, not when politics are involved. That's like saying that all the ex-Republican lawmakers in the Senate are for impeaching Hillary for wiping her hard drives.
Oh, did ex-Republican lawmakers in the senate sign a letter to that effect? I must have missed it.
The parts in red generally are far less densely populated than the parts in blue. I'm not sure what your point is.
The point is that politics will side with the people they like. The article states that over 600 people have signed that they don't like Trump. I'm stating that half of the US would sign that they do. Tit for tat. It's a stupid hit job article that's meaningless to half the country.
The point is that politics will side with the people they like. The article states that over 600 people have signed that they don't like Trump. I'm stating that half of the US would sign that they do. Tit for tat. It's a stupid hit job article that's meaningless to half the country.
600 former prosecutors from both sides of the aisle. You can't claim that everyone who doesn't kowtow to Trump is a partisan without looking foolish, which is exactly what you are doing.
You can read dozens of pages in a row without any consideration of the other side of things.
The report was stupidly disorganized, and the same points were brought up again and again, and each time there was a whole lot of prefatory baloney followed by some random incomplete discussion. Maybe somewhere there was something about the other side of the story, but it sure is hard to find. Why don't you point me to what you're talking about?
They cited the Fake News as their source over 125 times.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
