Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nadler said he didn't want him to release anything regarding the grand jury. He's not asking him to break the law.
According to the law, releasing grand jury information on national security to government officials involved with national security is well within the law.
Holding a guy in contempt for not violating the law.....
You people foaming at the mouth are being fed a pile of crap.
The redacted part of the Mueller Dossier, is Grand Jury confidential information. It is a violation of federal law to release the Mueller Dossier, unredacted.
Numbnutz Nadler knows that.
Let us see if Pelosi can hold down the fort for another foolish journey.
Hold a guy in contempt, because he won't violate federal law. Marvelous. If that isn't Hitlers Fascism, what is?
The guy didn't have to let anyone see the Mueller Dossier. More transparent than any other administration ever.
You people foaming at the mouth are being fed a pile of crap.
The redacted part of the Mueller Dossier, is Grand Jury confidential information. It is a violation of federal law to release the Mueller Dossier, unredacted.
Numbnutz Nadler knows that.
Let us see if Pelosi can hold down the fort for another foolish journey.
Hold a guy in contempt, because he won't violate federal law. Marvelous. If that isn't Hitlers Fascism, what is?
It appears like there is a strong chance that the Democrats will not bring the HJC's contempt motion to the floor for a vote by the whole House because their case is so pathetically wek..We will see, but if they do not, then this has just been a lot of particularly ineffectual political posturing.
Democrats are telling AG Barr that he should either get held in contempt or violate federal law. That is unprecedented, and it will hold this committee up to derision.
Democrats are telling AG Barr that he should either get held in contempt or violate federal law. That is unprecedented, and it will hold this committee up to derision.
And there it is...the thing I've been reading and hearing over and over.
So we have WhatAboutClinton distractions, insults, and lies.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch we have a Attorney General who is acting as a personal attorney for Trump instead of the U.S. and both Barr and Trump are doing their best to undermine the Constitutional system of checks and balances and the rule of law.
No amount of distractions, insults, or lies will change that stark truth.
Has Nancy brought this to the floor of the House for a vote yet?
If this is such a Constitutional Crisis, you'd think she would want to move on it immediately and get it resolved.
Has Nancy brought this to the floor of the House for a vote yet?
If this is such a Constitutional Crisis, you'd think she would want to move on it immediately and get it resolved.
What is she waiting on ?
Maybe she's waiting for the Trumpocrat Party to pin its "badge of honor" on Mr. Barr's chest in a farcical ceremony?
Has Nancy brought this to the floor of the House for a vote yet?
If this is such a Constitutional Crisis, you'd think she would want to move on it immediately and get it resolved.
What is she waiting on ?
She's waiting to get more support from the public and other Dems.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
