Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:32 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Nadler can see it whenever he wants

What is stopping him?

You’re not seeing the grand jury material though
Didn't you peddle this lie yesterday and then backtrack when I posted a link proving you wrong? Why yes, yes you did.

The full report is not available to Nadler.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:36 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
What are you talking about? The Congressional Democrats have never stated that they would find anything in particular. Maybe they find something, maybe they find nothing. The point is that proper oversight requires full disclosure of investigatory reports such as the Mueller report within the confines of the law.

Mueller's report found a comprehensive attempt by a foreign power to interfere with our elections, hundreds of contacts between Trump's campaign and that power, and 11 instances where the President personally acted in a manner that many prosecutors agree would have resulted in a multiple count felony indictment for obstruction of justice but for a sitting President's procedural protection under the OLC guidelines. I can't think of why any American would not want full disclosure of that report.

I like governmental transparency. So did my fellow Republicans until many decided to rubbish their conservative credentials to worship at the altar of a snake-oil salesman.
Releasing an entire report online is now “not being transparent” lmao!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:42 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Releasing an entire report online is now “not being transparent” lmao!
1. The entire report was not released online.
2. Barr was not referred for contempt for failing to release the entire report online.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:45 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
1. The entire report was not released online.
2. Barr was not referred for contempt for failing to release the entire report online.


And the public isn’t getting the entire report. Barr is not going to break the law and release the grand jury material. And never will nonmich how you cry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:50 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
And the public isn’t getting the entire report. Barr is not going to break the law and release the grand jury material. And never will nonmich how you cry
Barr isn't being referred for contempt for failing to release the entire report to the public.

The resolution has been posted for you. I'm not sure why you continue to ignore it and post nonsense and lies on which you backtracked less than 24 hours ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 08:52 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Barr isn't being referred for contempt for failing to release the entire report to the public.

The resolution has been posted for you. I'm not sure why you continue to ignore it and post nonsense and lies on which you backtracked less than 24 hours ago.
haven't backtracked on anything. We know what Dems are trying to do. Create public theater and give red meat to their base, and also attack Barr for not doing something he shouldn't do. That's why Barr told them to pound sand
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 09:08 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,526,696 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Nadler has the clearance to go read the unredacted parts.
But if he reads the unredacted parts, he will not be able to go out and lie about what is in them afterwards. Clearly he does not want to be constrained in that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 09:13 AM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,195,632 times
Reputation: 3877
Dems are embarrassing themselves, almost feel sympathy for them. The mueller report didn’t deliver them the goods so they are trying to manufacture a crisis. They get an A for effort but the execution is terrible and there just isn’t enough there to justify their alleged “constitutional crisis”. They are having trouble coping with the fact that impeachment is being taken off the table, they’ve given Trump their best shot and he keeps goings, and Barr is a major threat right now with his investigations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 09:20 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,526,696 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
Dems are embarrassing themselves, almost feel sympathy for them. The mueller report didn’t deliver them the goods so they are trying to manufacture a crisis. They get an A for effort but the execution is terrible and there just isn’t enough there to justify their alleged “constitutional crisis”. They are having trouble coping with the fact that impeachment is being taken off the table, they’ve given Trump their best shot and he keeps goings, and Barr is a major threat right now with his investigations.
/End thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2019, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
haven't backtracked on anything. We know what Dems are trying to do. Create public theater and give red meat to their base, and also attack Barr for not doing something he shouldn't do. That's why Barr told them to pound sand
You mean like Richard Burr is doing with Donnie Diaper?

Got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top