Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2019, 07:19 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,698,425 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

It's really simple.

Save your money before you get pregnant, and use it to take off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2019, 07:25 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,618,785 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
It's really simple.

Save your money before you get pregnant, and use it to take off.
Nah, forcing other people at gunpoint to pay for it makes more sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 07:38 PM
 
20,186 posts, read 23,910,343 times
Reputation: 9284
You get paid for not working? Huh... I can see it as a perk but mandatory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 07:51 PM
 
2,068 posts, read 1,005,116 times
Reputation: 3641
I had a coworker in Canada who gave birth several years ago. She took 15 weeks of maternity leave and 35 weeks of parental leave. While on leave, she got pregnant again - another 15 weeks and 35 weeks.


The company paid her salary (or a percentage thereof) for almost two years while she did not work. When the second leave was about to end, she gave notice that she would not return to work.


Nice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 07:58 PM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,763,206 times
Reputation: 4838
Companies should set their own policies for parental leave, not the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,881,518 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacInTx View Post
I had a coworker in Canada who gave birth several years ago. She took 15 weeks of maternity leave and 35 weeks of parental leave. While on leave, she got pregnant again - another 15 weeks and 35 weeks.


The company paid her salary (or a percentage thereof) for almost two years while she did not work. When the second leave was about to end, she gave notice that she would not return to work.


Nice!
Come October, 2020, you know, right before the election, Federal employees, male and female, will get a tax payer- funded parental leave. No doubt, some of them will engage in unprotected sex during the leave and in doing so, become eligible for another round.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 08:02 PM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,943,653 times
Reputation: 6328
The federal govt UNDER TRUMP, just approved 3 months leave with pay for parental leave for federal workers.



We discussed this at work; ironically most men didn't give 2-hoots about it and supported it. It was actually some older women who seems most toxic towards it, with some even claiming age discrimination.



I don't have a problem with 3 months + pay. Making sure you have a stable birth rate is absolutely critical to the republic. Look at Japan. They are facing an existential crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 08:08 PM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,763,206 times
Reputation: 4838
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
It's really simple.

Save your money before you get pregnant, and use it to take off.
But all those rich people must pay for poor women who get pregnant and cannot work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 08:09 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,618,785 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
You get paid for not working? Huh... I can see it as a perk but mandatory?
Not only getting paid for not working. They want to be paid for doing the most selfish thing in the world: having their own baby.

Nothing more selfish than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2019, 08:13 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,887,124 times
Reputation: 25191
States are perfectly allowed to do this on their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top