Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2020, 07:54 AM
 
46,325 posts, read 27,152,415 times
Reputation: 11136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
The longer it takes for the House to send over the articles, the more people are paying attention.

They sure are, but not in the way you are thinking.....nearly all the dems who voted said this was about NATIONAL SECURITY.....if so and the impeachment had to happen extremely quick, why did nancy not deliver the articles as soon as possible? It was more important for them to go on Christmas break...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
The more they are learning about the criminal activities of Trump:


Trump is a un-indicted co-conspirator with his lawyer Cohen and should be sharing a cell. The office is saving Trump.

Trump is a financial fraud and has committed many white collar crimes. The last 2 are:
1. Trump U- fined $35 million paid in 2017 after being in office. The office is saving Trump.

2. DJT Foundation: Fined $2 million just paid last week. Trump accepted money and used it for personal gain. Even transferring to his campaign. The office is again saving Trump.

trump U was started in 2004......people were only mad because he became president.....


the foundation was started in the late 80's.....I know you hate all the good it did...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
Trump has other's in his past as well as contact and traveling with Jeffery Epstein the pedophile king. Sleeping with a porn star as his youngest was born. Attacking other woman over time.

And we are all pretty sure you supported hillary...you know, who has a husband that traveled with jeffery epstein the pedophile king.....received BJs and used cigars for reasons other than smoking....attacked those women who testified towards him....and lets not forget paula jones....who slick willie paid to settle a sexual harassment case out of court....


BUt you care nothing about that....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
Trump a crook who is not an honest man, has no character or morals.

Says the hillary supporter...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
Then the abuse of a low class NYC mob want-a-be by trying to bribe a foreign nation to interfere in our election.
The outright obstruction of Congress.
So Trump was Impeached and the Senate should remove him.

After 3 years of the top 2 FBI agents in the United States....that's all you could come up with.....and it's completely fabricated uselessness....all because you and your ilk lost the election....


Sad, but completely expected....


So yea, again, people are paying attention, but not in the way you are thinking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2020, 07:56 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,253,742 times
Reputation: 4985
Are there bots working here on CD seven days a week?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 07:58 AM
 
46,325 posts, read 27,152,415 times
Reputation: 11136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
In this country we have real judges...that can dismiss trials before they even go to court...no different

No doubt, and when you had at a minimum 2 voters who cared not a single bit about evidence, yet still voted.....it would never ever make it anywhere.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 07:59 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,678,767 times
Reputation: 21097
This says it all.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
"experts say" = "analysts say" = "economists say" = "pollsters say" = crank at MSM pushing a false narrative as fact. These days fodder for the truly stupid and clueless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,161 posts, read 9,055,673 times
Reputation: 18846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
McConnell has announced he's not impartial, there will be no witnesses, no evidence. Just a quick vote.

Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?

McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.

Let's get all of the evidence, all of the testimony, out on the table. Don't hide it from the Senators, and don't hide it from We the People. Where's the transparency?

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/for...ith-witnesses/
that's how sham investigations are handled.

McConnell has them by the short hairs.

House want more witnesses, more evidence? ...should have gone through the courts to try and get them. Now they expect McConnell to do it? Most preposterous thing I've ever heard.

trump wins, you lose, again and again....lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
14,787 posts, read 8,129,079 times
Reputation: 25183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
McConnell has announced he's not impartial, there will be no witnesses, no evidence. Just a quick vote.

Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?

McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.

Let's get all of the evidence, all of the testimony, out on the table. Don't hide it from the Senators, and don't hide it from We the People. Where's the transparency?

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/for...ith-witnesses/

Quote:
Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?
The truth, plain and simple.

(If they could exonerate Trump, he would be demanding that they testify.)

Quote:
McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.
Exactly....and McConnell is one of the worst, most corrupt politicians in our country.


Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
There is no evidence to support an impeachment. It’s all based on hearsay. A vote is all that’s needed. The senate did its job and we move on to the next liberal whine.
The Senate's job is to try the impeachment case in a trial, before taking a vote...not try to sweep it under a rug, and pretend it doesn't exist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by animalcrazy View Post
Haven't we had enough of the corruption and obstruction yet? I think over half of our country has. Those witnesses should have been present in Congress to testify, but Trump obstructed every thing he could, hence one article of obstruction of Congress for which he was impeached. I guess his million dollar donor Sondland who bought his ambassadorship saying out loud under oath that there was a quid pro quo and everyone knew about it means what? Nothing? Bolton saying that he wants nothing to do with the drug deal being cooked up means what? Nothing?

Think of Congress as a grand jury finding probable cause for a crime, and yes, it is illegal for a president to with hold aid appropriated by Congress. The impoundment control act was voted into law because of Nixon and his abuse of with holding funds Congress had already approved because he didn't like a program. There are narrow parameters for which a president may with hold funds but the law states that CONGRESS MUST BE NOTIFIED. Installing a toxic termite yes man to take over the payments and with hold them is not the right way to do it. It reeks of sketchy, corrupt behavior. As a side note, two OMB officials resigned because they wanted no part of the illegal move Trump made. There's the other article of impeachment. Abuse of power. Trump is not king Donald, nor has he ever respected that we have 3 co-equal branches of government. Failing to honor that is in direct violation of his oath to uphold our constitution.

Look. If these witnesses could exonerate Trump they would have been allowed to testify before Congress and in the Senate. Trump is obstructing and hiding behind fall guys yet again, only Sondland decided he did not want the same fate as Flynn, Manafort, Gates, and Stone. He told the truth to Congress. The rest need to do the same in the Senate. McConnell can plan his sham acquittal without witnesses or documents, and he may get away with it in the short term. With his approval ratings in the toilet in Kentucky? It may cost him his seat.

For you to say that there is no evidence is just plain wrong. Trump is impeached.

McConnell and a lot of GOP Senators need to lose their seats over this. They care nothing for the rule of law or truth...and insist on putting their own personal interests and party over the interests of our Country and the rule of law.
It is why Comey, a lifelong Republican told people during the last election if they care anything at all about our Country, the only thing that they can do right now, is to get out and vote for the Democratic candidates. The same thing holds true today. I believe that strongly...and I was a Republican myself for over 4 decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,582 posts, read 18,193,881 times
Reputation: 15562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
McConnell has announced he's not impartial, there will be no witnesses, no evidence. Just a quick vote.

Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?

McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.

Let's get all of the evidence, all of the testimony, out on the table. Don't hide it from the Senators, and don't hide it from We the People. Where's the transparency?

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/for...ith-witnesses/
Democrats don't like the truth,, they make it up as they go for the fake impeachment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:20 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,934,846 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazee Cat Lady View Post
The truth, plain and simple.

(If they could exonerate Trump, he would be demanding that they testify.)


Exactly....and McConnell is one of the worst, most corrupt politicians in our country.



The Senate's job is to try the impeachment case in a trial, before taking a vote...not try to sweep it under a rug, and pretend it doesn't exist.





McConnell and a lot of GOP Senators need to lose their seats over this. They care nothing for the rule of law or truth...and insist on putting their own personal interests and party over the interests of our Country and the rule of law.
It is why Comey, a lifelong Republican told people during the last election if they care anything at all about our Country, the only thing that they can do right now, is to get out and vote for the Democratic candidates. The same thing holds true today. I believe that strongly...and I was a Republican myself for over 4 decades.
The Mueller investigation & report made it clear the impediment to indictment of President Trump for obstruction of justice is the Justice Department’s position that a sitting president cannot be indicted for any crime.

It also made clear that charging this President is the job of Congress.

It also made clear that an impeachment inquiry must begin immediately.

Another irony here is the complaints that the Mueller investigation took too long, & the impeachment proceedings were rushed through.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:23 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,934,846 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Democrats don't like the truth,, they make it up as they go for the fake impeachment.
Why is the impeachment a "fake" one?

(& does this mean we are now admitting Donald Trump is impeached?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2020, 08:27 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,558,235 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
McConnell has announced he's not impartial, there will be no witnesses, no evidence. Just a quick vote.

Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?

McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.

Let's get all of the evidence, all of the testimony, out on the table. Don't hide it from the Senators, and don't hide it from We the People. Where's the transparency?

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/for...ith-witnesses/
Of course Trump can't afford to allow mulvaney, Bolton, and Pompeo to tell the truth under oath. They would testify as to his guilt. Remember Pompeo lying to the camera when asked about the whistle blower report? Pretending he had never heard of it before and making some smart comment as to how he was just be presented with this and expected to have an answer?

Then we find out ~ Pompeo knew all along and was up to his neck in it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
There is no evidence to support an impeachment. It’s all based on hearsay. A vote is all that’s needed. The senate did its job and we move on to the next liberal whine.
If there isn't enough evidence for the Republicons in the Senate - then of course they should hear from witnesses with direct involvement. They heard witnesses in the Clinton impeachment - via depositions, etc.

But Trump won't allow ANY of his witnesses to testify. Why is that do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top