Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A reminder of why Mr. McGah's testimony is important to the impeachment proceedings:
During his interviews for the Mueller investigation, Mr. McGahn reported that Mr. Trump repeatedly instructed him to have the special counsel ousted & then told him to deny having been so instructed when word of the action emerged in news reports. He did not carry out either instruction.
A reminder of why Mr. McGah's testimony is important to the impeachment proceedings:
During his interviews for the Mueller investigation, Mr. McGahn reported that Mr. Trump repeatedly instructed him to have the special counsel ousted & then told him to deny having been so instructed when word of the action emerged in news reports. He did not carry out either instruction.
So, a boss told someone to do something, and they did not do it....tell us again why that is wrong?
It is no crime to withhold money from a corrupt government. There was no quid pro quo.. MSM uses sensationalism to get their listeners to think any thing our president does is wrong. Fact is Trump did NOTHING WRONG. The hype is over the top insinuating daily that Trump did something corrupt but there is nothing there that is corrupt. Just an attitude which is just an opinion . A bunch of gossipers on MSM..
The House Judiciary committee filed suit in August seeking to enforce its April subpoena for Mr. McGahn to testify about Mr. Trump's efforts to impede former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that documented Russian interference in the 2016 election & numerous contacts between his campaign & Moscow.
On November 25, 2018, U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson ruled that Mr. McGahn must comply with the subpoena.
On January 3, 2020, the D.C. Court of Appeals panel heard oral arguments on the McGahn case & another related case:
Two separate panels of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard nearly three hours of oral argument on two committee cases related to former Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. Both were filed months before the House voted to impeach President Donald Trump on his dealings with Ukraine.
House counsel warns of ‘gun battle’ in fight for Trump info
Letter said there’s no case that comes anywhere close to saying Congress cannot go to court to enforce its investigatory powers
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
