Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-15-2020, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Retired in VT; previously MD & NJ
14,267 posts, read 6,972,499 times
Reputation: 17878

Advertisements

NewToVenice,

So what is your stance in the case of rape or incest? What if it is a young teen (say a 14 year old)? Would you force her to go through 9 months of pregnancy and have a baby? Or would you allow her to have an abortion?

What would you do if the woman's life is in danger from the pregnancy ... to the point that keeping the fetus will very likely kill her? Would you allow her to have an abortion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,067,879 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
It's the truth that is known from biological standpoint.

To say that abortion does NOT end life, end pregnancies, and kill babies is denial of science.
A pile of car parts does not equal a car.

Would you pay $50,000 for a garage filled with car parts that have not been assembled?

A fetus is not the same as a baby and does not have the same value as a baby.

If the value of a fetus equaled the value of a baby our society would require fathers to pay fetal support and you would be able to declare them as a dependent on your tax returns.

The beauty of Roe v Wade.....no one will ever force you to abort what you believe is a baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,671,593 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
Anyone who thinks morals are absolute, really means they consider their morals to superior to all others and is frustrated they can’t force everyone to live by them. Hate it for them. Must be hard to walk among the rest of us morally inferior beings.
And individual's morals can be very fragile. A woman who wants all abortion banned may change her mind and go get an abortion after surprised by her unwanted pregnancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:06 AM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,886,932 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
And individual's morals can be very fragile. A woman who wants all abortion banned may change her mind and go get an abortion after surprised by her unwanted pregnancy.
Kind of like pro-life politicians and leaders who make sure their mistresses get abortions even as they are attempting to deny them to everyone else. It's always different when it's personal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:07 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,966,337 times
Reputation: 18157
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Murder is a very serious crime. Punishment for it can be up to life in prison or even death. Do your morals tell you the same thing should happen to a woman who gets an abortion?
You are AGAIN looking to a legal solution to a MORAL issue.

Morality is quite clear. Murder is wrong. Abortion is wrong. If morality (which is absolute) were internalized -- instead of law -- women would NOT be getting abortions (except for medical necessity.... 'cuz I want to?' Is not a medical necessity). Women would know that abortion was wrong. The laws, whether they support abortion or don't support abortion would be IRRELEVANT.

I suspect most women deep down know it's wrong. It's why they always say ... WELL I WOULDN'T DO IT ... before claiming they support it. If they truly believed it were a great thing to do, well, they would have no problem doing it themselves, wouldn't they. Because it's all good.

I had been hoping you would be able to follow this line, but in spite of my many posts about morality and law-- which YOU keep bringing up-- and trying to lead you to this point, you are STUCK on whether it's legal. Not moral.

To you it will always be a legal issue. And I suspect if *suddenly* it was illegal, you would be OK with that. Because ... law. Right?

If you look to law to dictate your morality, you have no morals. General statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:09 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,966,337 times
Reputation: 18157
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
And individual's morals can be very fragile. A woman who wants all abortion banned may change her mind and go get an abortion after surprised by her unwanted pregnancy.
No, she wouldn't. Morality is absolute. Is she did 'change her mind' then she doesn't have that sense of morality.

Morality is SIMPLE. You want it to be complex. Not sure why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:12 AM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,886,932 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
No, she wouldn't. Morality is absolute. Is she did 'change her mind' then she doesn't have that sense of morality.

Morality is SIMPLE. You want it to be complex. Not sure why.
SIMPLE minds are unable to grasp complex issues. You should stop trying. You obviously lack the ability to see beyond black and white, and abortion is NOT a black and white issue. Only in your simple mind it is. You are in over your head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:15 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,966,337 times
Reputation: 18157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
A pile of car parts does not equal a car.

Would you pay $50,000 for a garage filled with car parts that have not been assembled?

A fetus is not the same as a baby and does not have the same value as a baby.

If the value of a fetus equaled the value of a baby our society would require fathers to pay fetal support and you would be able to declare them as a dependent on your tax returns.

The beauty of Roe v Wade.....no one will ever force you to abort what you believe is a baby.
A baby in the womb has 100% of the DNA that is present at EVERY stage of development. A car part is not a car. Your analogy is beyond illogical.

You don't understand what RVW represents.

Aside from the fact that Jane Roe / Norma McCorvey? IS PROLIFE. And never EVER had an abortion.


But Planned Parenthood never tells you that, do they.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MUUvcvjEg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:21 AM
 
18,414 posts, read 19,051,059 times
Reputation: 15736
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
A baby in the womb has 100% of the DNA that is present at EVERY stage of development. A car part is not a car. Your analogy is beyond illogical.

You don't understand what RVW represents.

Aside from the fact that Jane Roe / Norma McCorvey? IS PROLIFE. And never EVER had an abortion.


But Planned Parenthood never tells you that, do they.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MUUvcvjEg
RVW is about privacy. We have the right to privacy, both men and women equally. Medical privacy. Don’t care if Jane did or didn’t. Doesn’t have a bearing on the decision the courts made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2020, 10:23 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,966,337 times
Reputation: 18157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansible90 View Post
NewToVenice,

So what is your stance in the case of rape or incest? What if it is a young teen (say a 14 year old)? Would you force her to go through 9 months of pregnancy and have a baby? Or would you allow her to have an abortion?

What would you do if the woman's life is in danger from the pregnancy ... to the point that keeping the fetus will very likely kill her? Would you allow her to have an abortion?
The circumstances of conception are irrelevant. If your arm was broken in a car accident or because you were assaulted during a robbery, would it be treated any differently? Would you demand it be amputated since it was contaminated by a crime?

If the mother's life is TRULY threatened, the mother should be saved. That is a MEDICAL treatment issue. Doesn't happen very often.

These "OMG, I'm gonna GOTCHA her with my BRILLIANT QUESTION" posts get tiresome. Because there's no 'gotcha' here, sorry, shrug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top