Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2020, 11:52 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,380,719 times
Reputation: 11382

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Duh...considering the number of high schools in this country. Not to mention, Ivy League schools do examine more than academic performance. However, Sotomayor wasn’t lacking in that department.
You seem to be admitting you made a stupid comment. Thanks. And I agree.

Quote:

"Ivy League schools do examine more than academic performance."
We're not asking whether she can row a boat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2020, 12:19 AM
 
22,474 posts, read 12,011,140 times
Reputation: 20398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
The majority were barred based on race alone.

Are you trying to act as though your father was the norm?
He wasn't alone. One of his colleagues, who held the exact same job as my father, was black.

I can tell you more stories about minorities who went to college and had successful careers before affirmative action.

You also don't understand one negative side affect of affirmative action. After it took effect, minorities who went to top colleges, often found people questioning their success. Some even were rude and crude enough blurt out such things as "You only got into College X because you were a minority."

Often non-minorities who were qualified to attend Ivy League schools were often pushed aside because a college felt pressured to have X number of minorities.

And, given Sonia Sotomayor's age, she was a beneficiary of affirmative action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 12:36 AM
 
Location: Central Florida
1,329 posts, read 832,740 times
Reputation: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
They hate that they aren't getting their way.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court 'putting a thumb on the scale' for Trump

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she is concerned the Supreme Court is going out of its way to help the Trump administration.

The high court voted along ideological lines on Friday to grant the Trump administration's demand for an emergency request to stay an injunction in an Illinois case regarding the restriction of low-income immigrants from entering the United States. Sotomayor wrote in an opinion that her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court, who have the majority, are “putting a thumb on the scale in favor of” the Trump administration.

“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote on Friday. “That the government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”

...
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, criticized what she described as a troubling pattern of the conservative justices ruling in favor of the Trump administration without looking at these cases in an objective manner.


NEWSFLASH: We voted for this. It is absolutely fair.



The courts aren't supposed to be ideologically driven. Ideology is not justice, it's partisan hackery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 02:18 AM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,886,302 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Still waiting for your answer. Where did you attend school for your first and second degrees?

She was valedictorian at her high school. What were you? Were you even in the top 10 percent? 20 percent?
To be honest I have met many Engineering grades that can't balance a checkbook or pay their bills on time. A degree isn't always the best measure.

In Sotomayor's case, I am no lawyer and I am unqualified to second guess her qualifications. She is pretty much bias to the left, she makes no attempts to hide that fact. Compared to the other SCOTUSs I don't know her level of experience compared to her peers. She may very well be the mouth breather in the group of elite judges. I disagree with RBG's politics but absolutely respect her as a SCOTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 02:56 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
They hate that they aren't getting their way.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court 'putting a thumb on the scale' for Trump

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she is concerned the Supreme Court is going out of its way to help the Trump administration.

The high court voted along ideological lines on Friday to grant the Trump administration's demand for an emergency request to stay an injunction in an Illinois case regarding the restriction of low-income immigrants from entering the United States. Sotomayor wrote in an opinion that her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court, who have the majority, are “putting a thumb on the scale in favor of” the Trump administration.

“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote on Friday. “That the government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”

...
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, criticized what she described as a troubling pattern of the conservative justices ruling in favor of the Trump administration without looking at these cases in an objective manner.


NEWSFLASH: We voted for this. It is absolutely fair.
Since when is upholding a federal law (immigration regarding public charge) that pre-dates the Trump Admin by over a century "putting a thumb on the scale in favor of the Trump administration?"

Public Charge Provisions of Immigration Law: A Brief Historical Background - USCIS

Shame on Sotomayor for being so ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 03:24 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
If she's not getting her way she should just start calling them childish nicknames...

Some apparently believe the Constitution grants that right solely to the POTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 03:32 AM
 
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
5,067 posts, read 1,668,233 times
Reputation: 3144
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Expressing concern does not equate to whining.

Actually, it is whining.


Its nothing new for the Democrats for years now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 04:09 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,281,167 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
They hate that they aren't getting their way.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court 'putting a thumb on the scale' for Trump

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she is concerned the Supreme Court is going out of its way to help the Trump administration.

The high court voted along ideological lines on Friday to grant the Trump administration's demand for an emergency request to stay an injunction in an Illinois case regarding the restriction of low-income immigrants from entering the United States. Sotomayor wrote in an opinion that her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court, who have the majority, are “putting a thumb on the scale in favor of” the Trump administration.

“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote on Friday. “That the government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”

...
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, criticized what she described as a troubling pattern of the conservative justices ruling in favor of the Trump administration without looking at these cases in an objective manner.


NEWSFLASH: We voted for this. It is absolutely fair.
Ms. Sotomayor.... it's not your job to comment on this. Elections have consequences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOBUEM0-FHk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 04:24 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
They hate that they aren't getting their way.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court 'putting a thumb on the scale' for Trump

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she is concerned the Supreme Court is going out of its way to help the Trump administration.

The high court voted along ideological lines on Friday to grant the Trump administration's demand for an emergency request to stay an injunction in an Illinois case regarding the restriction of low-income immigrants from entering the United States. Sotomayor wrote in an opinion that her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court, who have the majority, are “putting a thumb on the scale in favor of” the Trump administration.

“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote on Friday. “That the government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”

...
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, criticized what she described as a troubling pattern of the conservative justices ruling in favor of the Trump administration without looking at these cases in an objective manner.


NEWSFLASH: We voted for this. It is absolutely fair.
Justices have publicly disagreed with court outcomes for more than 200 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 05:15 AM
 
59,113 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14289
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
They hate that they aren't getting their way.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court 'putting a thumb on the scale' for Trump

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she is concerned the Supreme Court is going out of its way to help the Trump administration.

The high court voted along ideological lines on Friday to grant the Trump administration's demand for an emergency request to stay an injunction in an Illinois case regarding the restriction of low-income immigrants from entering the United States. Sotomayor wrote in an opinion that her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court, who have the majority, are “putting a thumb on the scale in favor of” the Trump administration.

“It is hard to say what is more troubling,” Sotomayor wrote on Friday. “That the government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it.”

...
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, criticized what she described as a troubling pattern of the conservative justices ruling in favor of the Trump administration without looking at these cases in an objective manner.


NEWSFLASH: We voted for this. It is absolutely fair.
"Yet, she NEVER complains when the courts vote IN FAVOR of her liberal ideals! Nothing new.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top