Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Was it murder
Yes 299 58.86%
No 68 13.39%
Don't know/let's wait and see as more evidence is gathered 141 27.76%
Voters: 508. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:35 AM
 
45,674 posts, read 24,159,615 times
Reputation: 15561

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jencam View Post
He could have kept going is what this poster is saying. He's not like the one pretending Arbery was further away.
They were pointing a gun at him.....and yes he could have kept running and maybe they would have shot him in the back. He was trying desperately to save himself. Maybe he didn't make the right decision -- but he shouldn't have had to make the decision in the first place...even if he did steal something -- which he didn't -- he had nothing in his hands....

There is no justifying the actions of the guys with the guns.

Ironically one of them left their gun in an unlocked car and it was stolen previously. That's a huge problem for me. These people are not the brightest and shouldn't be allowed to have guns...all you smart, responsible people who wouldn't go chasing a random guy down the street pointing a gun or leaving your gun in the car unlocked should be able to own a gun -- these numbskulls clearly shouldn't.

 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:36 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,490,178 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
When you run from behind a vehicle all the way to the front then turn to head back down the left side, have you run past the vehicle?
You may have run past the vehicle, but not so far you would be backtracking.

He ran to the right side of the vehichle because Travis was out of the truck with his gun on the left side.

As he got to the very front of the vehicle Travis went to the front as well.

Arbery was still moving forward and made a hard right a fraction past the front of the vehicle.

He decided imo that Travis was a threat to his life and thats why he moved left to try to take the gun away.

He never ran down the left side of the vehicle back in the opposite direction.

In the struggle they both moved off to the left but not because Arbery was backtracking.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:37 AM
 
21,098 posts, read 13,682,343 times
Reputation: 19728
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Following someone and getting out of your vehicle is not attempting an arrest. Saying "we want to talk to you" is not attempting an arrest.

Even if we assume that they would have attempted an arrest at some point, they never got the chance to because Arbery doubled back and attacked them for following him.
All that is in the 911 call is STOP! You'd think they'd want to repeat 'We just want to talk to you' if that was the case. Re-assure him. We don't know that they ever said that at all.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,309,356 times
Reputation: 7528
Interesting I just received an email from Change.org this week to sign a petition to disbar prosecutor George E. Barnhill.

This was what the email stated.

Quote:
George Barnhill is a prosecutor in Georgia. After two white men shot Ahmaud Arbery in February, Barnhill said the killing was "justifiable." Thousands are demanding the disbarment of Barnhill over his treatment of the case. "We need to feel like there is justice in the justice system," writes Destiny on this petition. She needs your signature today to make sure there is accountability for the way law enforcement handled Ahmaud’s death.

We are calling for the disbarment of prosecutor George E. Barnhill. We feel his decision to sit on the case of Ahmaud Arbery’s murder for three months was out of prejudice/racism and a personal relationship with the murderers.

We need to feel like there is JUSTICE in the justice system and not based on racism, prejudice, or personal feelings. Mr. Barnhill displayed a clear case of not being able to disconnect himself from this case and look at the clear cut facts involved.

Also we are very aware that Mr McMichael was a police officer who worked CLOSLEY with the district attorney’s office up until last year. How many murders has Mr. Barnhill covered up against minorities using the "self defense and citizens arrest statute"?

We the people do not feel justice can be served appropriately with a prosecutor like Mr Barnhill receiving these cases and sweeping them under the rug without even PRESENTING them properly. We feel he is operating based on his own personal agenda. He should not get to decide whether or not our sons, brothers, or fathers even DESERVE justice before their stories get their day in court.

Also we ask that all other cases that have crossed his desk be looked over again by a non bias party. How many others have been murdered in silence.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,280,175 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
A reasonable person who was caught in a house they didn't belong in, who knew exactly why they were being chased, and knew exactly what their intentions were, would not feel like a violent injury was likely to happen. They'd know that having to deal with the cops was likely to happen, and that's what he was trying to avoid.

You attempt to erase nearly all of the facts of the case in order to push your false narrative and it's just not going to work.

When the thief made the decision to attack those "chasing" him were stationary and he'd already run past them. There was absolutely no reason to think that violent injury was imminent.
He went into fight mode after he had already tried flight. Under GA stand your ground law, he had no legal requirement to try to get away from men who were chasing him and set up a road block and was standing in the road with a shotgun while their buddy Roddy herded him from the back. He was well within his right to try to defend himself from their assault.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:41 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,490,178 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Based on what? He already had run past them....they already had "let him pass". Were they going to keep following him? Sure, but you can't say they weren't going to let him pass when he already had passed them when he decided to double back and attack them. It just doesn't make sense.
When did they let him pass them?

Travis went to the front of the truck where you say he passed which he really didnt.

Are you talking about somewhere else during this chase?
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,954 posts, read 17,970,730 times
Reputation: 10397
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
They were pointing a gun at him.
No they weren't. The video shows the shotgun pointing down. Can you point us to the evidance that says he pointed the gun at Arbery because I haven't seen or heard of any.


Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
....and yes he could have kept running and maybe they would have shot him in the back. He was trying desperately to save himself. Maybe he didn't make the right decision -- but he shouldn't have had to make the decision in the first place...even if he did steal something -- which he didn't -- he had nothing in his hands....
That's one way to look at it, but it in the end, it was his actions that caused his own death.


Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
There is no justifying the actions of the guys with the guns.
Yes there is and it's been discussed ad nauseam. That you refuse to see it is on you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Ironically one of them left their gun in an unlocked car and it was stolen previously. That's a huge problem for me.
Has nothing to do with the case. That is a huge problem for people who look to solve the problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
These people are not the brightest and shouldn't be allowed to have guns...
It's called the 2nd amendment. how come you aren't smart enough to know that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
all you smart, responsible people who wouldn't go chasing a random guy down the street pointing a gun or leaving your gun in the car unlocked should be able to own a gun -- these numbskulls clearly shouldn't.
They didn't point a gun at him, that we know of. Men defend their property and neighborhood. Cowards make excuses and don't get involved.

Sen Warren was right, "Men, if you can find one."
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:43 AM
 
8,970 posts, read 2,586,996 times
Reputation: 4738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
You may have run past the vehicle, but not so far you would be backtracking.
When you run from behind a vehicle, to beyond the front of the vehicle, and end up pretty far to the left of the vehicle, you have backtracked rather than continuing to move forward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jencam View Post
All that is in the 911 call is STOP! You'd think they'd want to repeat 'We just want to talk to you' if that was the case. Re-assure him. We don't know that they ever said that at all.
When someone decides to charge at me, I'm not going to say more than "STOP", you don't have a full on conversation with a charging attacker.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,280,175 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
Let me put this out there: He was trespassing:

Yes, he was trespassing. You don't own the site, you don't live there, just because the building/project is still under construction does not mean anyone has a free pass to walk through the property

Someone caught trespassing on another person’s property can face trouble, even possibly a civil lawsuit. But trespass is first and foremost a criminal offense.

While state laws define criminal trespassing somewhat differently, the typical elements of the crime are:

intentionally entering or remaining on
someone else’s property
without authorization.
Which doesn't matter since the McMichaels did not see him entering or leaving the house, they said that they saw him "hauling a**" down the street.
Seeing someone running down the street is not a legal reason to chase them, corral them, and confront them with weapons.
 
Old 05-16-2020, 11:47 AM
 
8,970 posts, read 2,586,996 times
Reputation: 4738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
When did they let him pass them?
When he ran past the truck, they let him pass them. We know this by the fact that they let him run all the way past the truck. They were parked in the street well before he got there, so they could have done something to prevent him passing them if that was their real goal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top