Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-03-2020, 09:10 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,458,676 times
Reputation: 14266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Why are most cities in this country that are medium sized or larger run by Democrats?
Because cities have greater mix of educated people from diverse backgrounds who are more acclimated to technological progress and social differences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2020, 09:53 PM
 
1,485 posts, read 955,484 times
Reputation: 2498
Because stupid people vote in Dems. Where you have dems you have lots of ghettos. Liberal Dems are a cancer to this nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2020, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Somewhere below Mason/Dixon
9,471 posts, read 10,814,451 times
Reputation: 15980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
When people live in dense population centers they become Collectivists, Leftists and fake Progressives. Also cities attract the poor and minorities for the purposes of Welfare and Section 8 housing. All vote Democrat because it either makes them FEEL good, or they want STUFF or both. That's all.
A very unpopular truth. Urban areas do not always attract our best and brightest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2020, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rkstar71 View Post
Because stupid people vote in Dems. Where you have dems you have lots of ghettos. Liberal Dems are a cancer to this nation.
Stupid people? Seems that you had difficulty constructing a simple sentence. You know what they say about people who live in glass houses, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2020, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post
A very unpopular truth. Urban areas do not always attract our best and brightest.
It's actually quite the opposite, urban centers usually attract the best educated and wealthiest people.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/...uality/577924/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2020, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Somewhere below Mason/Dixon
9,471 posts, read 10,814,451 times
Reputation: 15980
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
It's actually quite the opposite, urban centers usually attract the best educated and wealthiest people.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/...uality/577924/
If that is true explain why places like Detroit, Saint Louis and Baltimore are the most dangerous crime ridden places in America. Why are cities filled with people looking for handouts? Why are we watching video of urbanites burning and looting?

The idea that cities are where the most educated and enlightened individuals live is a leftist fantasy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2020, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN -
9,588 posts, read 5,847,652 times
Reputation: 11116
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post

The idea that cities are where the most educated and enlightened individuals live is a leftist fantasy.
No, it's not a leftist fantasy. I can't believe this is even being argued, because it's a well documented fact, actually:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19n7...w?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19qm...w?usp=drivesdk

https://www.businessinsider.com/wher...ns-live-2017-3

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...n-backing-him/

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...n-backing-him/

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/...ig-racial-gaps

https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018...ty-type-01-11/

https://news.stanford.edu/pr/2014/pr...es-070814.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2020, 06:33 AM
 
1,485 posts, read 955,484 times
Reputation: 2498
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Stupid people? Seems that you had difficulty constructing a simple sentence. You know what they say about people who live in glass houses, right?
You lost the argument so you critique my sentence structure. Try sticking to the subject smart guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2020, 06:36 AM
 
366 posts, read 110,696 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Except the cities pay for the rurals. Whether it’s farm subsidies, tariff relief, public funding of private pensions to coal miners, Disability in the South, giveaways to Appalachia, etc. the cities are the economic engines of the country. In my state, Seattle gives $3 billion a year to 33 mostly rural counties.

Blue cities pay for rural infrastructure, we’re even paying for their broadband. That requires education and work. Cities are where the educated live and where the educated pay taxes. The less educated live in rural areas and vote Republican, putting their hands out for money from the Democratic cities while insulting them. That’s why it was so easy for Trump to appeal to them.
This crap again, it always comes back to "we're smarter" with libs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2020, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,990,162 times
Reputation: 5712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
I seriously think rurals scream about socialism while desperately depending on the cities. Until they learn to stop insulting the cities, I think the cities should pull their money. Cut them off. Buy their food elsewhere and honestly, let capitalism work even if it means some farmers don't make it. A tech worker in a city knows if things go south at one company, they need to get a new job at another. They need to keep their skills current. They don't get handouts and they pay massive taxes. To do all that and get insulted by rurals is a long term problem and I'm very tired of it, especially when Trump is doling out billions of THEIR money.

Red states are over represented electorally because low populated states have the same number of senators as highly populated states. Iowa and California = equal. We know how common it has become for Republicans to win the presidency with a minority vote. That means it's easy for Iowa (or McConnell's Kentucky) to suck up blue state tax dollars. It's why so many blue states contribute more than they get back. So my answer is, the way it is set up results in blue cities generating a ton of money and being forced to hand it over to rural towns and red states, who then insult them.
The rural areas around the cities in my state are most decidedly poorer areas than in the cities. Down south, if you live in a small country town, you're either a farmer or an unemployed person living on government assistance. There's still a few service type jobs for some of the rural grocery stores, gas stations, and whatnot, but for the most part, the jobs have all relocated to the metro areas.

Almost all of our smaller towns were mill towns from the great expansion period of the USA, now that those mills are no longer needed, the only people left in those towns were the ones who didn't pack up and move to the metros.

I don't think cities care one iota about what happens outside their city limits. But as far as your opinions, I see it as the exact opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top