Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
They did not have a debate on Garland, he was not even considered in the Judiciary Committee it had nothing to do with doing away with the filibuster, besides the filibuster only changed in the lower courts not the supreme court. McConnell also did away with the blue slip recommendations in home states appointing judges from across the country in home state courts.
McConnell also stated "we shouldn't legislate as if we will be in power forever" when he took office then he went and did exactly that raising the stakes.
I would support a return to 60 vote rule but if you look at the history the last 20 years it was definitely abused. This hyper partisanship in the courts is bad for the country, we are starting to look like a banana republic.
|
Just great and I usually don't agree with you. I don't even totally agree here but I look for reasons to rep "opponent's" posts. I think some adults must gather, on both sides of the aisle, and ensure that every judicial opening does not become a barn-burner.