Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Shame on you if you really are an MD. You should know better than to diagnose a person you have never examined, never mind the willful blindness your claim that Biden has dementia requires to ignore the MUCH MUCH more evident signs of problems with Trump's mental capacity. And note, I am not a medical clinician making any diagnosis, just giving a layperson's opinions of very visible symptoms. But someone who holds themselves out to to be a physician is held to a higher professional standard.
Glad it is just a lay person's personal attack on a professional.
There is no doubt that Bidden should not be out in public but Harris needs to be someone's lap dog so he is serving her purpose. Can you imagine, that besides packing the court, how the two of them would squabble over who is in control...She will sink her teeth in, rabid with power, while Biden won't let her steal is long failing quest for the White House. It is frightening to think what the two of them could do if....
I trust the collective IQ of America to swat that fly.
Creepy Uncle Joe won't answer because he knows he doesn't have a say in the matter. The radical left pulls the strings on sock puppet Biden and he knows it.
No matter what he says, no one is going to believe him anyway, but it's disingenuous to dodge the question.
They don't always get to be the offender first. Do we really need to go through history to find all the times the democrats were the offender first? This is DC politics we are talking about.
I am saying, if you want payback, then do something proportional. If you want escalation, do something disproportional, like court packing.
I want escalation. I want Republicans to rue the day. We've been hearing "own the libs" and "we drink liberal tears" for four years. There's nothing wrong with giving it back. Even Trump supporters have to know it will come eventually. If we're completely honest, neither side wants to keep the country together. Not really. I think when the GOP took the gloves off with Obama, they knew they were choosing the most destructive course. They don't get to claim victimhood now.
I want escalation. I want Republicans to rue the day. We've been hearing "own the libs" and "we drink liberal tears" for four years. There's nothing wrong with giving it back. Even Trump supporters have to know it will come eventually. If we're completely honest, neither side wants to keep the country together. Not really. I think when the GOP took the gloves off with Obama, they knew they were choosing the most destructive course. They don't get to claim victimhood now.
Escalation only leads to escalation. The dems add 2 justices. Republicans retaliate by adding 4 justices. And so on, and so on.
Like I said, that might be fun to watch, but probably best for the country if nobody sets the precedent in the first place.
Democrats would pack the courts.
They’d RAISE your taxes by $4 TRILLION
They would encourage Americans NOT to take a coronavirus vaccine.
Joe Biden’s mental state is DECLINING
The Left would reinstate the terrible Iran Deal
Joe is WEAK on China
They would DESTROY the economy
So you shouldn't have a problem when the GOP does it when they regain power. Before you know it, we will have a 100 justice Supreme Court. This will be fun to watch.
A good way to slow the hyper partisanship would be for the republicans to actually abide by the Biden rule that they became aware of in 2016 rather than this sudden concern about court packing.
I'm not being silly. Democrats want PC speech and censorship, gun control, open borders, and everything else that would create a permanent one party rule.
No you are being silly neither the first or second amendment goes anywhere with two more justices.
A good way to slow the hyper partisanship would be for the republicans to actually abide by the Biden rule that they became aware of in 2016 rather than this sudden concern about court packing.
Exactly, let Biden fill RBG’s seat and there will be a de-escalation around packing.
No you are being silly neither the first or second amendment goes anywhere with two more justices.
Why would Kamala/Biden add only two Justices? They would add 4 or more and get at least 7-6 far left decisions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
