Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2020, 01:50 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,474,425 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
Because regardless of their monetary contributions at the present time they are affected by policy. Might as well say only people paying 10K or more yearly in taxes can vote. Monetary contribution should not be a factor in our right to have a voice in representation.
Should the census not count anyone not working and paying taxes. After all it is the population that determines the number or representatives and the number of representatives determines the number of electors.
Used to be just land owners could vote. This just another way for conservatives/reactionaries to limit the vote in their decided favor.

As far as land, there is a way around that:

SquareInchDeeds.com | Own a piece of Land – give a unique gift
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2020, 02:02 PM
 
9 posts, read 10,519 times
Reputation: 11
Again, if they don't contribute via taxes, why should they be involved in the decision making process?




Approximately half of Americans do not pay any federal income tax and the current President has tried many times to not pay any either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 02:03 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15338
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyRUMad View Post
On TV a few days ago I saw an interview with an 80+ year old waiting in line to vote. Likely this dude will be dead before anything enacted will make any difference in his life.

Should we have a cutoff age to vote?
Of course not. My FIL was climbing the Rockies at 84. Please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 02:04 PM
 
8,337 posts, read 2,966,443 times
Reputation: 7898
Yes. No one younger than 25.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:10 PM
 
4,710 posts, read 7,103,522 times
Reputation: 5613
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyRUMad View Post
On TV a few days ago I saw an interview with an 80+ year old waiting in line to vote. Likely this dude will be dead before anything enacted will make any difference in his life.

Should we have a cutoff age to vote?
No. Older citizens still have a stake, and should still be able to vote. I would like an upper age limit on presidential candidates and SCOTUS appointments. But that would take a Constitutional amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:11 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,459,324 times
Reputation: 13233
Should we have a cutoff age to vote?

No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:12 PM
 
16,415 posts, read 8,215,049 times
Reputation: 11403
Nope. If anything the older folks have been around longer and just know better. I'd trust the vote of an 85 year old over a 19 year old who doesn't know who they are yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:23 PM
 
Location: New York City
19,061 posts, read 12,723,110 times
Reputation: 14783
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyRUMad View Post
On TV a few days ago I saw an interview with an 80+ year old waiting in line to vote. Likely this dude will be dead before anything enacted will make any difference in his life.

Should we have a cutoff age to vote?
The problem you suggest is that some people are not in their right mind to vote. The response is that there is no correlation between age and mental ability. A guy like Trump has razor sharp focus and massive stamina and a guy like Joe Biden is completely lost most of the day and doesn't know where he is.

If you want an age based restricted, it would have to be cognitive based, which would make it biased, which would make it useless (not to mention unconstitutional)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
Nope. If anything the older folks have been around longer and just know better. I'd trust the vote of an 85 year old over a 19 year old who doesn't know who they are yet.
The problem is that seniors already "have theirs" as they're (mostly) retired and living on 401k/pension and SS plus Medicare. So they don't have the vested interest in the public policy that those of us under retirement age have
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2020, 04:30 PM
 
74 posts, read 33,359 times
Reputation: 51
No, first we should have a cutoff age to run for president/senator/House rep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top