Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump hasn't even lost yet, but his apologists seem really butt-hurt, which is evidenced by all these threads crying about unfairness in the elections.
That's fine that you hate Trump, but saying he won by a fluke in 2016 is just flat-out stupid.
I think you missed the point of that person's post. Agree regarding the "fluke" comment as he won fair and square with the rules everyone knew is in place.
I think the meat of the person's argument is this false sense of security that Trump and his follower believe to be popularity. He lost the popular vote so it's not surprising to anyone outside of MAGAland that he lost the popular vote again but by a bigger margin.
Yes that person (in my opinion ) improperly used the word fluke when they could have said something to the effect of "barely won". But again Trump never reconciled that he "barely won" and mistook a victory in land mass for a victory in popularity.
Wolf won`t be fired because Pa. has term limits and he has had 2 terms. Our Senator Toomey (R) will not run for re-election in 2022 and there is no Republican in Pa. strong enough to take that seat. Can Trump run for president after NY state tries and convicts him?
State legislature write our laws which set the manner and process to elect the president, but we have governors, state courts and even boards of directors rewriting state election laws on the fly. They are essentially deleting entire sections of election law, to allow late voting and eliminating verification measures written in election laws.
A legal vote is one which meets the letter of written state law. We have thousands of illegally counted votes. Why do Democrats hate the law?
OK. A concrete example please. Exactly which state did this?
Trump hasn't even lost yet, but his apologists seem really butt-hurt, which is evidenced by all these threads crying about unfairness in the elections.
There is no evidence if you refuse to look at the evidence.
Poll workers in WI, MI and PA have already described the fraud they witnesses in public and have reported the "anomalies". Republican observers have been unlawfully ejected from polling places. A poll worker took a screen shot of seven "voters", all of which were born in 1900!!!!
Of course there will be no "evidence" in your mind if you refuse to look at the evidence presented.
Don't worry- despite your burying your head in the sand and ignoring the evidence, others will not do so and this will be investigated.
Q:The following piece of code is returning 1900-01-01 when the DOB field is null. I wanted (and expected) it to return an empty string ('') but it's not. How should I proceed to get my desired results?
A:A NULL date is NULL (no value). An empty string, on the other hand, evaluates to 0, which in SQL Server is implicitly an integer representing the number of days since 1900-01-01.
Yes there is and it's called an absentee ballot you request an absentee ballot through the mail it's mailed to you you have a witness and certified you sign it and you mail it in before election
That's in YOUR state. What's true in YOUR state is not necessarily what's true in mine.
If you don't like that state of affairs, you can get it changed. You just have to amend the Constitution.
Nothing like a cheater accusing the cheated of cheating while deep in the process of trying to cheat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.