Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2020, 03:44 AM
 
130 posts, read 77,277 times
Reputation: 113

Advertisements

Maybe he realised it was too hard to tackle that problem.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2020, 04:02 AM
 
Location: Metro Seattle Area - Born and Raised
4,912 posts, read 2,062,076 times
Reputation: 8670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uconn97 View Post
Well, I doubt we will agree, but the 2nd amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for service in the militia. Today's world is vastly different than it was back in the late 1700's. Using that same logic, Jim Crow laws should still exist, segregation is great, etc. My point is - things change. NO ONE needs unlimited access to guns with the firepower that advanced technology has given us. Do I think people should be able to own guns? Yes. Do I think there need to be restrictions on types and numbers? Yes.
Using this logic than using the internet, watching TV or listening to the radio shouldn’t be covered under the First Amendment... What about voting by Mail??

People can’t pick and choice when it comes to the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

If Biden attempts to do a forced government buy-back or force people to pay a numerous NFA tax on their already owned legal firearms and magazines that would force the country into a Constitutional crisis that will have some very negative effects on the country... This is way when Biden and the Left’s calls for unity is pure BS. Nothing more and nothing less and will not happen.

Right now the country is evenly split and this stupid act and yes, it’s a stupid act, will divide the country to a point that nobody wants to go or deal with the consequences that will come with this stupid act.

The Second Amendment isn’t about hunting and NEVER was about hunting. Currently, I do not fear my government, but that can change overnight, if pushed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2020, 04:12 AM
 
Location: NYC
3,046 posts, read 2,385,731 times
Reputation: 2160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody01 View Post
No, Obama never actually came for our guns......he just threatened to. And because of the threats and perception, there are now tens of millions more.

Now Biden has been much more specific about coming for them. We'll see.

But a huge tax is certainly one way, although no one will comply. That will create an interesting situation....
The only time he's actually threatened any such thing was in the fever dreams of gun loving republicans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nandorrei View Post
the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
Actually the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is if a good guy doesn't sell him one, in the first place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Yes, Bill did sign the failed, and sunseted Assault Weapon and magazine ban of 1994 which we suffered through for ten years. The only thing that stopped Obama was a Republican Congress. If Biden is elected and gets a Dem Congress we will get effective gun bans and confiscation. They might be called buy backs, but they will be mandatory and unconstitutional.
Obama had a super majority for 2 years. Why didn't he do it then? How did the republicans stop him when they had no means to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 06:08 AM
 
Location: U.S.
3,989 posts, read 6,580,127 times
Reputation: 4161
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Sorry, but this is about the dumbest comment I've ever read in a gun related discussion. That was really, really bad, and to me, it shows that you're just not putting any effort into the conversation, at all. If that's the case, why bother participating?
Oh I'm sorry. You must have mistaken me for someone who cares about your opinion on my opinion. I didn't know I had to meet some vague standard of conversation to participate in an online forum, but thanks for letting me know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:10 AM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,801,923 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister 7 View Post
Live in a state where you aren’t required to register them.
I think people are talking about a National registration. Mandatory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,323 posts, read 26,245,816 times
Reputation: 15659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody01 View Post
I think people are talking about a National registration. Mandatory.
How do you suppose national registration will happen, will Biden issue an executive order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:50 AM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,801,923 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
How do you suppose national registration will happen, will Biden issue an executive order.
Of course not. Too weak for an issue like this. t would only happen in a scenario where the Demorats get the Senate and can vote in their gun ban/registration issues. Even then, it would end up in the SCOTUS and lose, so really the Dems need to control the House, Senate, Presidency, AND stack the Supreme Court. Even this would not allow for removal of the 2A, since that takes 2/3 of the houses and 3/4 of the states.

But they could cause a major issue, possibly civil war, if they controlled bot houses......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,683 posts, read 14,662,025 times
Reputation: 15421
Trying the oldest trick in the book I see. What’s next, “He’s coming for our Bibles!”? That wouldn’t work too well with a Catholic I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:53 AM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,801,923 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
Trying the oldest trick in the book I see. What’s next, “He’s coming for our Bibles!”? That wouldn’t work too well with a Catholic I guess.
What are you talking about? Really.........comparing guns to bibles?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2020, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,683 posts, read 14,662,025 times
Reputation: 15421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody01 View Post
What are you talking about? Really.........comparing guns to bibles?
Same fearmongering from the right since the beginning of time. They try to scare all gun owners into voting Republican when no one has lost their private firearm to a Democratic politician yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top