Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
“Dr. John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service and former Dean at Chapman University’s Dale E. Fowler School of Law, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1999, specializing in Constitutional Law, Legal History, and Property. He also leads the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute that he founded in 1999. He has a Ph.D. in Government from the Claremont Graduate School and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, and a B.A. in Politics and Economics from the University of Dallas. He serves as the Chairman of the Board of the National Organization for Marriage and is Chairman of the Federalist Society’s Federalism & Separation of Powers practice group.”
I’d hate to speculate: logistics, they did not plan for the mass mail in ballots and/or foresee the problems that could have arisen as a result, hence a lawsuit could not be brought forth before the fact because there were no damages before the election.
What issues with mail-in ballots couldn’t have been addressed before hand. There were 44 states that expanded mail in balloting, it was done in all the primaries yet they waited until December 9 to raise the issue and only in 4 states. This is absolutely crazy.
Texas’s Frivolous Lawsuit Seeks to Overturn Election in Four Other States
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
There is no way the Supreme Court is going to entertain Texas’s lawsuit.
“Dr. John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service and former Dean at Chapman University’s Dale E. Fowler School of Law, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1999, specializing in Constitutional Law, Legal History, and Property. He also leads the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute that he founded in 1999. He has a Ph.D. in Government from the Claremont Graduate School and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, and a B.A. in Politics and Economics from the University of Dallas. He serves as the Chairman of the Board of the National Organization for Marriage and is Chairman of the Federalist Society’s Federalism & Separation of Powers practice group.”
He'll have a mess to clean up, for certain. Good thing for America he's up to the challenge.
He'd make a great Alzheimer's Czar. Always good to have an experienced guy at the helm.
We have GOT to start having a serious conversation about the upcoming divorce, unless you want to set everything on fire, and then nobody gets nothing. It doesn't matter WHO's in charge at this point, we definitely have a case of Irreconcilable Differences the likes of which haven't been seen since Fort Sumter.
He'd make a great Alzheimer's Czar. Always good to have an experienced guy at the helm.
We have GOT to start having a serious conversation about the upcoming divorce, unless you want to set everything on fire, and then nobody gets nothing. It doesn't matter WHO's in charge at this point, we definitely have a case of Irreconcilable Differences the likes of which haven't been seen since Fort Sumter.
Joe got a lot of experience fixing republican screwups when W left us tottering on the brink of a major depression, and he literally wrote the book on pandemic planning. He is the perfect man to follow the incompetence of Trump’s miserable performance during his term.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.