Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
[quote=ignatz713;59946628]Here's fraud for you. Stupid people subsidized him, and he keeps the money he didn't use. There's one born every minute, as PT Barnum said.
What Im wating for him is for him to eventually say he will run in 2024 to keep the scam going, and people REALLY send him their money. Campaign contributions have a whole new set of rules with him getting his hands on that money.
I wish both Republicans and democrats can come together to try to reveal it all.
This should all be transparent. If Biden still ends up with a winning margin after all the fraud is revealed then democracy worked, but it's still pretty bad
If enough fraud is revealed that Trump actually won then he should stay president, obviously.
I just wanted a clean election as possible, and we didn't get that here. Not even close.
The sad thing is whoever is president will be viewed as illegitimate. It's 2020, not 1820
It's ridiculous this could be a repeat of 1876
What do you want revealed?
The election was just as transparent as any other that's happened in the past century. Trying to compare any election that happened in the 1800s is a waste of time. Things changed too much to allow a comparison.
If you want any information about the election returns from any state, all you have to do is write a letter to the state's Secretary of State. You could probably find it all on the state's website.
What you won't ever find is fraud. If there was any fraud massive enough to turn the election, it would have been found and reported. Never forget there are over half of the states that have Republican administrations.
You can be sure that if there was fraud in Biden's favor it would have been reported the instant it was found. You can be sure the Supreme Court would have looked into the matter if there had been any evidence of fraud.
If there was evidence of fraud, Mitch McConnell would never have congratulated Joe Biden for his win.
If fraud existed, we would have seen Trump's A-Team lawyers in charge, not crazy Rudy Guiliani and his band of second-raters and alcoholics.
This is huge, how did the Kraken miss this. I demand a recount in West Virginia.!
Quote:
A West Virginia postal carrier pled guilty to mail and election fraud after admitting he changed the political affiliation on multiple voter ballot requests from Democrat to Republican.
Thomas Cooper, 47, admitted to attempted election fraud and injury to the mail Thursday after an affidavit was filed against him in May.
Cooper held a contract with the U.S. Postal Service to pick up mail in three towns in Pendleton County.
In April, per a statement from the Department of Justice, the county clerk found absentee ballot requests from eight voters that were tampered with a black ink pen, five of which had their party affiliation switched to Republican. Three others that had their affiliation already set to Republican were altered, but did not have their political party changed. All ballots were located in Pendleton County.
Really, it is rather astonishing how many votes President Trump received.
After all, he ignored Putin's putting a bounty on soldiers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould
My thoughts exactly.
How in the world can 71 million people think it is fine for Trump to pass classified intel to Russian agents in the Oval Office.
Or ignore Putin's bounty on U.S. soldiers.
Your positions are hypocritical.
Assuming it was true, the US has a bounty on Russian soldiers, but it would never publicly announce that.
And, the Russians learned it from the US, because the US paid a bounty to Afghan tribes for Soviet soldiers in Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
"Do as I say, not as I do" always fails.
The US throws a hissy fit when a Bear bomber comes within 500 nautical miles of Alaska, yet the US has violated Soviet/Russian airspace 100s of times --but always forgets to tell you that -- while the Soviet/Russians have never violated US airspace.
What do you call it when the assassins accuse the assassins?
Assuming it was true, the US has a bounty on Russian soldiers, but it would never publicly announce that.
And, the Russians learned it from the US, because the US paid a bounty to Afghan tribes for Soviet soldiers in Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
"Do as I say, not as I do" always fails.
The US throws a hissy fit when a Bear bomber comes within 500 nautical miles of Alaska, yet the US has violated Soviet/Russian airspace 100s of times --but always forgets to tell you that -- while the Soviet/Russians have never violated US airspace.
What do you call it when the assassins accuse the assassins?
Some first-class whataboutism there. You could apply that logic to every atrocity that's every happened to the US including 911. I'm glad you're not in charge of our national security.
Keep in mind KY is about as red as it gets, but something is fishy here.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
