Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-18-2020, 10:10 AM
 
13,284 posts, read 8,455,196 times
Reputation: 31512

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria View Post
Hmmm...might have been useful as part of her affidavit. That affidavit has been used in at least one case. The judge didn't find her credible since no one else mentioned things like machines jamming regularly, etc. in their affidavits and so on. Things that would have been easily noticeable.
What court case was this affidavits rendered? I only recall her hearing testimony by a committee. Not a court room with a judge. I could be wrong. So do you have the case number?

 
Old 12-18-2020, 10:20 AM
 
3,287 posts, read 2,022,994 times
Reputation: 9033
Fap fap fap
 
Old 12-18-2020, 10:24 AM
 
18,096 posts, read 15,670,593 times
Reputation: 26798
Courts *will* listen to evidence.

And, as long as the plaintiff has the legal right, jurisdiction, and standing to take their issue to court, a court will determine if evidence brought before them has merit (or not).

IF an attorney says they, on behalf of their client, are not alleging fraud in a case that came about because of a belief fraud was committed, that ends the case right then and there.

That very thing happened, with attorneys either admitting to their judge they can't "prove" fraud, or the attorney doesn't have the evidence, or they are not saying there was fraud, or what they do present to the judge doesn't meet the standard for proof.

Beliefs are not proof.

A judge will rule the case is dismissed, with prejudice. That has happened scores of times.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Rose capitol of Texas
552 posts, read 223,257 times
Reputation: 967
Melissa Carone sent secret video evidence of herself having sex with the father of another woman's child.

From her employers computer.

Police paid her a visit, liked what she told them so much they handcuffed her,
charged her with a crime and took her mugshot for posterity.

Is there no barrel bottom too deep for the MAGA zealots to scrape?

Last edited by Tylerrose; 12-18-2020 at 10:43 AM..
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,207,906 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nov3 View Post
What court case was this affidavits rendered? I only recall her hearing testimony by a committee. Not a court room with a judge. I could be wrong. So do you have the case number?
Her affidavit was introduced in a Michigan case.
https://www.wxyz.com/news/judge-rule...e-not-credible

This is the case.
https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/c...ty-of-detroit/

Here is a link to the filing that included her affidavit.
https://www.scribd.com/document/4844...vit-11-10-2020
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:41 AM
 
8,312 posts, read 3,927,691 times
Reputation: 10651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
What I've been saying all along. The push for legitimacy needs to start at registration, and actual voting, along with accurate, properly monitored counting. There are severe shortcomings when it comes to voter verification and handling of ballots, thumb drives, whatever, allowing the process to be questioned. If we can eliminate the possibility of fraud, it should make everybody happy, as long as everybody legally allowed to vote can do so. There is no reason it can't be done. 2020 is done. Too late even if there was enough fraudulent voting to make a difference. the way things were run, there is no way to be sure one way or the other. I'm just asking to end the doubt in future elections.
The only "doubt" in the 2020 election is in your mind, and in the paranoid fantasies of all the neo-fascist Trump cultists that thought they could enthrone Donald Trump simply by repeating "fraud" enough times on Twitter and Facebook.

The is ZERO doubt in the minds of every judge and Justice that reviewed the dozens of legal challenges, appointed by Trump or not - about the outcome and accuracy of this election. Biden IS the President-Elect, and we know now that this was one of the most accurate elections every help in modern times. As evidenced by numerous recounts and re-examinations.

You are perfectly free to keep having doubts - just be aware that most folks that have an ounce of common sense don't share them.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:49 AM
 
26,578 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435
trump's current twitter-tantrum:


" Governor @BrianKempGA of Georgia still has not called a Special Session. So easy to do, why is he not doing it? It will give us the State. MUST ACT NOW! "


the EC votes have been certified already. the state's actions are done concerning the election. there's nothing the GA can do at this point to change the results. don't know if trump is ignorant of this simple fact or he's intentionally manipulating his followers.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
trump's current twitter-tantrum:


" Governor @BrianKempGA of Georgia still has not called a Special Session. So easy to do, why is he not doing it? It will give us the State. MUST ACT NOW! "


the EC votes have been certified already. the state's actions are done concerning the election. there's nothing the GA can do at this point to change the results. don't know if trump is ignorant of this simple fact or he's intentionally manipulating his followers.
Both
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:52 AM
 
13,284 posts, read 8,455,196 times
Reputation: 31512
Thank you! The judge found her to overgenerilze . No one, neither poll worker, or other staff members could validate her statements of jammed machines, missing ballots and software tampering. She claims she reported her observation to the FBI. Her testimony in written form was ineffective and highly questionable.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 12:04 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moving415 View Post
Here's a good summary and explanation of voter fraud claims, and might explain why the "witness claims" have not held up: https://www.washingtonpost.com/elect...id=hp_politics
They don't care. They'd rather keep posting nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top