I congratulate you for proving what we already knew, which is that you don't understand even basic high school science.
Who can spot the Göbbels-style propaganda and disinformation in this disingenuous video?
First, the bottles are sealed, meaning a closed system. There is no cap around Earth and it is an open system.
So, this Göbbels-style experiment proves nothing.
Second, she lied by omission by not telling us the energy bandwidth produced by the "lamps." If those lamps do not produce bandwidths identical to the Sun then she not only lied, she committed fraud.
She said she can't bring the Sun into the laboratory, yet she could take the bottles outside where they would be exposed to the Sun.
Why do you think she refused to do that? Because she's a fraud.
Third, she lied by omission when she said "..
. the Carbon Dioxide molecule is particularly susceptible..." to the radiation emitted by Earth.
It is not. CO2 is only "susceptible" at bandwidths of 2.7 microns, 4.3 microns and 15 microns.
The Earth does not emit black body radiation at the 2.7 micron bandwidth.
Wien's Law T (Temperature) = b / wavelength in micrometers, where "b" is a constant equal to 2,900 um-K.
T = 2,900 um-K / 15 um = 193°K =
-112°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 4.3 um = 673.9°K =
753°F
What we can infer from that irrefutable science is that 4.3 microns has far greater energy than 15 microns, however the amount of Black Body Radiation Earth emits at 4.3 microns is minuscule, as this link proves:
https://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/ee...absorption.gif
She perpetrates another fraud by down-playing the impact of Water Vapor.
Water vapor absorbs at 5.9, 6.5, 6.9, 7.2, 7.6, 8.2 and 9.6 microns.
Wien's Law:
T = 2,900 um-K / 5.9 um = 491°K =
424°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 6.5 um = 446°K =
343°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 6.9 um = 420°K =
296°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 7.2 um = 402°K =
263°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 7.6 um = 381°K =
226°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 8.2 um = 353°K =
175°F
T = 2,900 um-K / 9.6 um = 302°K =
83°F
As you can see from the irrefutable scientific data using Wien's Law, Water Vapor is far more powerful than CO2 could ever hope to be and generates far more energy than CO2 ever will.
Finally, her Göbbels-style propaganda video doesn't prove global warming, but it does prove Charles' Law.
Did you guy do this very same experiment in your high school physics class?
We did.
When you heat any gas -- it doesn't matter what it is -- in a confined container -- and Earth is not a confined container, then you cause the all of the gas molecules to move faster.
As the gas molecules move faster, they are colliding with other molecules as well as the walls of the container and as the temperature rises, they collide more frequently and with increasingly higher force.
In a rigid container --plastics and metals are rigid but balloons are not -- these powerful collisions occurring at at more frequent rates results in higher pressure, which increases temperature.
How many of you use canned air to clean your computer or bug spray (for bugs not your computer)?
Notice how every time you spray the can cools?
It cools because you're decreasing pressure. The inverse is also true: it warms up when you increase pressure.
Some other flaws in her fatal "experiment."
She never weighed the containers.
Who on this forum would like to know why a Göbbelist would never wanna weigh the containers?
Let's start small.
Does the mouth of the container have the same surface area as the bottom of the container?
Nope.
The mouth of the container is about 2 cm in diameter and you do the Pir^2 stuff if you want, but the mouth of the container is way, way smaller than the bottom of the container.
Why is that important?
In an open system, pouring a heavier gas onto a lighter gas will displace the lighter gas.
But not in a closed system with a narrow mouth/opening.
There's no place for the lighter gas to go. It is trapped and gets compressed, meaning its volume decreases.
If she told us the quantities of bicarbonate soda and vinegar she used, we could calculate the amount of CO2 created by that reaction.
In a real
bona fide experiment, you would pump more air into the first container so that they had the same weights/volumes.
Notice she lied by omission by not mentioning humidity, but then why would she, since she down-played the role of Water Vapor.
That's all the Left's got is trickery and the veneer of science which is pseudo-science masquerading as science.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
