Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; says 1973 decision was "egregiously wrong" (Brown, abortion)

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Steve McDonald

The Supreme Court, by casting aside their sworn duty to uphold the law and constitution for us all, are imperiling the freedoms of everyone.

That makes no sense. SCOTUS is upholding the Constitution by upholding States' Rights (Article 1 Section 8 and the 10th Amendment). If states can restrict 2nd Amendment Rights, and they do (even red states do), they can restrict any perceived right to abortion.

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Well, if they actually did so, there would be no need for 700,000 abortions each year.

Exactly! They have every right to control their reproduction rights prior to having sex by using birth control or abstaining.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

The 9th has nothing to do with states' Constitutional rights.

Where did I say it did?

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

Where did I say it did?

In your response to Bob:

Originally Posted by Blondy

9th amendment

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

Exactly! They have every right to control their reproduction rights prior to having sex by using birth control or abstaining.

You have zero right to be inside someone's bedroom monitoring how they control their reproduction like some kind of sick voyeur. Nor does the state.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

In your response to Bob:

You have a reading comprehension problem and continually take things out of context to infer they mean something no one said.

That was in response to Bob saying abortion was mentioned 0 times in the Constitution.

Per the 9th amendment a right cannot be taken away just because it is unenumerated.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

You have zero right to be inside someone's bedroom monitoring how they control their reproduction like some kind of sick voyeur. Nor does the state.

No one said anyone or the state was going to mandate the use of birth control. The point is that if women and/or men actually used it, there would be no need for 700,000 abortions each year.

95% of all unintended pregnancies are the result of failure to use birth control (54%), or the use of such incorrectly/inconsistently(41%).

There's no excuse for that given the fact that various birth control meds/devices are available for free at our country's 4,000+ taxpayer-funded Title X Family Planning Clinics located nationwide.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

No one said anyone or the state was going to mandate the use of birth control. The point is that if women and/or men actually used it, there would be no need for 700,000 abortions each year.

95% of all unintended pregnancies are the result of failure to use birth control (54%), or the use of such incorrectly/inconsistently(41%).

There's no excuse for that given the fact that various birth control meds/devices are available for free at our country's 4,000+ taxpayer-funded Title X Family Planning Clinics located nationwide.

Not your business or the states.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

You have a reading comprehension problem and continually take things out of context to infer they mean something no one said.

That was in response to Bob saying abortion was mentioned 0 times in the Constitution.

You're incorrect, as usual. Go back and read your post.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

You're incorrect, as usual. Go back and read your post.

You are incorrect.

The conversation started before what you posted.