Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The flaw in your argument is the failure to define "child".
If you're arguing that a "child", say, 14 years and older should be able to work, that would likely be a vastly different discussion than a 5,6,7,8 year old.
i am quite sure any argument one can come up with was used in the USA a hundred years ago...you either side with those wishing to share a little wealth with the people or those divine job-creators IMO its that simple...
if the super-duper job creators can make a dollar they will....i suspect business will still flourish even if the world demands humane treatment of humans
I mean, really, is there a time when slavery is preferable in a practical sense to the alternatives?
Sure there is. Slavery didn't become became commonplace until societies developed that were robust enough to actually control slaves. Up until then, winning a war meant putting everybody to the sword, Old Testament style.
Child labor is bad because it promotes having kids and keeps kids out of government schools. Also promotes small business and entrepreneurialship.
Imo kids should be starting their careers at ie 14 as apprenticeships.
Small time labor, learning small trades, learning your family business / business is a GOOD thing, best learned early.
Child labor promotes entrepreneurship? Nudge my memory - what entrepreneurs have we seen rise from the ranks of Nike's sweatshops? Or from the 19th century mills?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.