Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Really tough to perform a study like this with valid data, you can't tell me that allowing air travel and cruise lines to continue in 2020 wouldn't have an impact on mortality.
You can't tell me it did either and you certainly can't tell me it was material enough to be relevant.
Really tough to perform a study like this with valid data, you can't tell me that allowing air travel and cruise lines to continue in 2020 wouldn't have an impact on mortality.
As the past two years have shown, we can't tell you any facts and expect them to sink in.
Really tough to perform a study like this with valid data, you can't tell me that allowing air travel and cruise lines to continue in 2020 wouldn't have an impact on mortality.
They screened over 18,000 studies to get about two dozen to analyze.
Really tough to perform a study like this with valid data, you can't tell me that allowing air travel and cruise lines to continue in 2020 wouldn't have an impact on mortality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
An infectious respiratory disease isn't spread in confined spaces.
Really difficult to establish guidelines and criteria to come to any conclusion when there were so many varying degrees of restrictions.
I think most would agree that an airline and cruise line operate in an environment of confined and contained spaces. So you must agree that had air travel and cruise lines been more open in 2020 it would have been insignificant..
I wonder if you would have the same difficulty in the data and analysis if the report said that without the "restrictions" there would have been 65% more deaths?
Oh, but JH is totally WRONG. Lockdowns did have major impact on deaths.
Not from covid though. Deaths from other diseases, that no one canceled, from psychosomatic diseases, developed during the 2 years, from people, that missed their cancer screenings or were afraid to go to clinics or hospitals, and so on.
Every half way decent economist knows that, when economy collapses or is being shut down - PEOPLE DIE as the result.
So much for "trusting the science".
This pandemic has taught us a few things:
-You can't trust the government.
-You can't trust so called medical "experts"
-You can't trust the media who get their "facts" from the government and medical "experts".
So much for "trusting the science".
This pandemic has taught us a few things:
-You can't trust the government.
-You can't trust so called medical "experts"
-You can't trust the media who get their "facts" from the government and medical "experts".
You know as well as I, that this was all about influencing voting patterns and making no-fault mail-in voting the norm for 2020.
Most of the people who died, had 3 to 4 other things already wrong with them. They died WITH COVID not from COVID. It won’t work in 22 or 24.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
