Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is no legal obligation to do so. Most businesses negotiate opt out clauses routinely, as many things can make it needed.
That is not the point. If the State wants to all of a sudden outlaw your business they need to be compensated. This is not the first time this has ever happened and I would sue the state for damages.
Maybe when we hear of national headlines of a parent(s) killing their 2 month -3 yr old children...the public will cheer them on and/or celebrate that the parents have this right?
***if we agree that women must always have that choice...there is no cause to get upset or want justice, if a parent kills their 6 month old child...right? Maybe the parents didnt realize how a newborn baby would impact their lives? Why take the mothers choice away after birth? Especially if its the womans first child, logically she should be given a grace period? IF people want woman to have the choice before birth, its not sensible to want that right taken away at some point either?
I think basically what the 'pro choicers' stand is...they want women to have the ability to make a choice, (but ONLY for a very brief period of time). LOL
Children n babies die everyday from the hand of a parent and a whole lot from the boyfriend. Those children usually suffer unspeakable pain, better they were not born. If children are forced to be born - where they are not wanted, this is their likely outcome.
Studies reveal that more than 900,000 infants in the United States were abused or neglected in a year.
Try 1925. Gitlow was the first case before the SCOTUS where they said the 14th Amendment extended the provisions of the Bill of Rights to apply to the governments of U.S. states.
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy
In their confirmation hearings, every single Justice who will vote to strike down Roe testified that Roe was the settled law of the land, including Trump's appointees. So, in other words, these Justices lied. Think about that.
Not one said Roe was settled law. They specifically refused to answer on Roe directly knowing cases might come before them. (The Ginsburg Rule) The discussed precedents and "super" precedents, but refused to classify Roe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
The blocking of Garland had not one thing to do with the Filibuster, not one thing. They blocked Garland because it was an election year,
They didn't vote on Garland because the president was being replaced and there was divided government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy
that excuse suddenly disappeared in 2020 when RBG died in October weeks before the election.
In 2020 it was not clear the president was going to be replaced and the government was not divided.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
You never explained why there was a Biden rule, and then .... there wasn't.
You appear to not know what the Biden Rule is. Biden said, “divided Government” (presidencey & Senate of different parties) reflected an absence of a “nationwide consensus” on constitutional philosophy. “Action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over".
In the case of 2020, the fact that the Republicans had both the presidency and the Senate reflected that the people had made their choice clear.
Children n babies die everyday from the hand of a parent and a whole lot from the boyfriend. Those children usually suffer unspeakable pain, better they were not born. If children are forced to be born - where they are not wanted, this is their likely outcome.
Studies reveal that more than 900,000 infants in the United States were abused or neglected in a year.
It's Mississippi!
If I were Pregnant I too would abort before bringing a child to live in that Uneducated, Poor and backward God forsaken Hell hole of a State.
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 29 days ago)
11,795 posts, read 5,801,446 times
Reputation: 14221
Lacie Wooten-Holway, a teacher, who works at a private school - Grace Episcopal Day School grades pre-K to 5 is a neighbor of Kavanaugh protesting outside of his house. Obviously, her beliefs don't jive with the teachings of the church. Wonder what else she is teaching her students.
Lacie Wooten-Holway, a teacher, who works at a private school - Grace Episcopal Day School grades pre-K to 5 is a neighbor of Kavanaugh protesting outside of his house. Obviously, her beliefs don't jive with the teachings of the church. Wonder what else she is teaching her students.
It's Mississippi!
If I were Pregnant I too would abort before bringing a child to live in that Uneducated, Poor and backward God forsaken Hell hole of a State.
That’s kind of a racist attack against the state with the highest black population in the country.
According to libs - only conservatives are allowed to eat crap sandwiches.
No laws have changed with this. Only federal oversight, and the fact that Democrats can't use the cover of the Supreme Court to enforce their preference. They may actually have to take a real position and vote on record if they want a real federal abortion law.
Except plenty of people who are pro-choice aren't Democrats.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
