Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An entire population of unmarriageable and promiscuous women is bad for society as a whole. I, personally, hypothesize that it's at least partially responsible for many of the current problems in the US.
Women who want to have sex will have sex. Kinda like men who want to have sex will do.
They will, but it should be discouraged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui
Do promiscuous men get a pass?
This is a complicated question. Men and women are different by nature. Prior to abortion and contraceptives, women needed to be selective when choosing whether to engage in sexual activity. This had a stabilizing effect on society. Women, in general, are the choosers when it comes to sex and relationships. So it is their responsibility to control access to sex.
But, in the past, men were also more likely to not be promiscuous. This allowed marriage and child bearing to occur at any earlier age, which was beneficial for society.
So, in conclusion, neither gender should be promiscuous.
On an individual level, using abortion as a contraceptive method.
On a societal level, this kind of behavior decreases people's values, increases the perceived disposability of their partners, and leads to population crises (when combined with contraception).
Bull****. Oh yes they did force them to take the vaccine.
There are millions of people who were forced into take the vaccine under duress. Duress is not the same thing as a choice. It is coercion. I had hoped an intelligent person would know the difference.
Duress or coercion refers to a situation whereby a person performs an act as a result of violence, threat, or other pressure against the person.
Duress is pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person to perform an act they ordinarily would not perform.
you are correct, there were many people who were threatened with their jobs if they didn't take the vaccine, so they'd not only loose their jobs, but their pensions, everything, so....
Even law enforcement and airlines did it....
well, if women would be more responsible and keep their legs closed, abortions wouldn't be necessary....that's being responsible and morally responsible. Your not in Kansas any more.
Why is the woman still blamed 100% for an unwanted pregnancy?
Ultimately, the woman carries the baby (and was the only one who decided whether or not to keep the baby should she get pregnant). So the onus is on her to prevent it from happening.
Quote:
This is the year 2020!
It's not though.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
