Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Merrick Garland has stated that the DOJ would have employed less intrusive means if available. Why not a second subpoena?
Why such a show of force? Why not just a few agents?
If the FBI believed Mar-A-Lago contained documentation with sensitive nuclear information, why wait two months since June?
If the FBI thought sensitive materials which Trump was legally unauthorized to possess were present at Mar-A-Lago, have they identified and demanded Trump hand it over? If this was the case, why would Trump refuse a lawful FBI request given he handed the FBI information earlier this year? And if the information was THAT important, why did the FBI merely recommend the addition of another lock during its June visit?
Did the warrant actually identify the material or the classification level of the said material?
And given the mole allegation (a confidential informant) - was there deliberate concealment of the material within Mar-A-Lago or was there nothing more than the affirmation that there were more documents present?
It's usually the aides who pack the boxes and who have them shipped.
Unless an anti-Trumper (like Hutchinson?) did it just to get the very results that we're seeing now, then it was simply an aide who'd screwed up and had them shipped to MAL instead of the archives.
Why would the aides have access to classified documents? If he had someone without a proper clearance pack them, he violated the law right there.
Merrick Garland has stated that the DOJ would have employed less intrusive means if available. Why not a second subpoena?
Why such a show of force? Why not just a few agents?
Why didn't Trump just turn over what he had illegally taken when he was asked back in the spring? Just think, all of this could have been avoided if he had just done the right thing. Trump brought this on himself.
Why didn't Trump just turn over what he had illegally taken when he was asked back in the spring? Just think, all of this could have been avoided if he had just done the right thing.
You have not read carefully. That however is your problem.
Any idea why a former president would want these documents so badly and refuse to give them back? This is an honest question as I'm not assuming anything.
You have not read carefully. That however is your problem.
I have read carefully. I just don't buy what you are selling. We know they asked him to return what he had back in the spring. And we know he didn't give them everything he had. And that's on him.
I have read carefully. I just don't buy what you are selling. We know they asked him to return what he had back in the spring. And we know he didn't give them everything he had. And that's on him.
You mean you don't want to believe anything that might force you to rethink your position.
You know? I know?
No, you are incorrect. You THINK you know, but you're being lied to.
i just heard the papers was for nuclear, and the demmy want to execute trump as a spy
Where'd you hear that? Another conspiracy site making things up to get people riled up. No "demmy" has called for execution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
