Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Back to the topic, I believe it is pretty clear he refused to compete because of the Israeli swimmer, whether his own decision or from back home is irrelevant (it still is despicable). Earlier this year, a similar incident occured too:
An Iranian swimmer refused to compete in his heat at the Croatian Open Swimming Championships, which were held over the weekend in Dubrovnik, because an Israeli swimmer was due to compete in the same heat, the official Iranian news agency reported yesterday.
I disagree. If it was his own decision that is one thing. If his government ordered him to do it (much more likely), that is another. Guy was a victim more than anyone.
Recall the childish U.S. and Soviet boycotting back in the Day. It was the athletes that lost out.
Iran refusing to attend if Israel competes is acceptable, but selectively not competing due to Israeli presence is not.
I think either way it is silly and inappropriate in a sports setting for countries to take their squabbles and make empty irrelevant statements.
But to call out the poor guy if his government orders him not to swim is also inappropriate. Anyone who has ever tried to achieve in sports or other venues can certainly empathize with this individual who is just a pawn in international politicking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.