Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,239 posts, read 3,230,494 times
Reputation: 1180

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
My last job in PC Corporate America had me (an auto mechanic) working for a black manager who had no idea what I was talking about 99% of the time. This, never the less, in no way deterred him from shooting me down because he felt that I, an ASE certified master mechanic and advanced provability specialist with many years of dealership experience and factory training, didn't know what he knew. A few months after I left, they closed down. I have to assume because they simply couldn't keep mechanics. That's AA in action.
Typical white male comment. I'm white, so I MUST be better than that black guy who got his job because of AA. LOL. Poor white guy was discriminated against how again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:14 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
38% of the population is white male. EEOC is selectively applied. promotion ladders greatly favor women and non white groups. a white male supervisor is 10 times more prone to get an EEOC complaint of any kind than any other supervisor.a false EEOC complaint will kill a career ladder dead. many college ed programs are not available to white males. but most important K12 discipline is selectively applied to white males. open racial hostility to this group is tolerated by K12 and even encouraged. this does not apply to the upper 2% of the population that suffers none of these deprivations and is held up by AA and feminists as the norm.
signed
a non white
see profile

Last edited by Huckleberry3911948; 03-19-2010 at 11:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:14 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Swedge View Post
This OP doesn't make any sense at all.

Obviously all males are in the minority. Thats the first thing.

Obviously, Whites are a minority race as well. That means White men are a double minority.

It's not something we "feel". It is a fact. Do you deny that White men are a minority?
I was speaking more to the fact that a lot of straight white guys feel like they are discriminated against regularly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Yes, but nothing to really get excited about- the slightly more than occassional annoyance if you will.

Mostly, its an ongoing implication, if not accusation, that as a SWM with a rightward tilt I am somehow responsible for everything bad that has happened from 2000 BC to the present. Whatever...

As for discrimination, By 1978, I had lost count of how many times blacks insulted me for my race. Hypocrisy and double standards by a bunch of loudmouthed cowards. It made me cynical and was at times outright dangerous, but I cannot say it affected my destiny.

Affirmative Action has reared its ugly head in my department as they have promoted someone who simply does not have the tools needed for extended responsibilities. It affects me in that I have to pretend and support this fiction.

So the answer is yes although I am not going to claim to be a SWM version of James Meredith or Cesar Chavez. Everybody takes some crap now and then.




"It affects me in that I have to pretend and support this fiction."


I HATED the daily song and dance I had to go through to avoid confrontation with my AA manager because he was too stupid to understand what I was telling him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:44 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I was speaking more to the fact that a lot of straight white guys feel like they are discriminated against regularly.


Obviously white males are a statistical minority. Numbers are numbers, but what makes white males unique is that they are the only minority group that may be legally discriminated against. Doing this is exactly as morally revolting as discriminating against gays, females, veterans, the handicapped or blacks, but, in the case of this one group, it is done with the blessing of the state.


The useful myth of white male privilege is the foundation of all anti-white male bigotry by blacks and females. However, one isn't born white and male, and, as a natural consequence, rich. One is born rich and happens to be white and male. So why punish poor white males for the privilege of wealthy white males? The country club set is unaffected by AA. The poorest white males are the ones who give up their seat for blacks and females of any social and economic standing including the most connected and wealthiest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:48 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
what makes white males unique is that they are the only minority group that may be legally discriminated against. Doing this is exactly as morally revolting as discriminating against gays, females, veterans, the handicapped or blacks, but, in the case of this one group, it is done with the blessing of the state.
How is it done with the blessing of the state? There's nothing in the laws that single out straight white men to say that it's fine to discriminate against them. The anti-discrimination laws say "race", "gender", and in some states, "sexual orientation". They don't say "black", "white", "female", etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:54 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
How is it done with the blessing of the state? There's nothing in the laws that single out straight white men to say that it's fine to discriminate against them. The anti-discrimination laws say "race", "gender", and in some states, "sexual orientation". They don't say "black", "white", "female", etc.
by the process of selective law enforcement. see those 30 guys standing in front of home depot speaking spanish this morning?
selective law enforcement. EEOC does the same in the work place. what it says in the penal code is not what happens in the courtroom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 11:55 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
by the process of selective law enforcement. see those 30 guys standing in front of home depot speaking spanish this morning?
selective law enforcement.
Huh?

A little proof might bolster your argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2010, 12:01 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Huh?

A little proof might bolster your argument.
huh what kind of proof do you want they do it every morning.
same as the sheriff 1 block away every morning writing tickets for a turn on red b4 930AM. you mean why didnt i get DNA b4 i made such assumptions?
i worked with EEOC for years what argument???, i just told you what happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2010, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
How is it done with the blessing of the state? There's nothing in the laws that single out straight white men to say that it's fine to discriminate against them. The anti-discrimination laws say "race", "gender", and in some states, "sexual orientation". They don't say "black", "white", "female", etc.


"There's nothing in the laws that single out straight white men to say that it's fine to discriminate against them."

Yes, but their is nothing that says it is not fine to discriminate against them based on their gender and race. And who are you to argue that point? Don't you want special protections for gays? Haven't you argued that exact point in the past?


If I have an apple, orange and banana for sale, but then I lower the price of the orange and the banana, technically I didn't raise the price of the apple. So what? I still screwed the apple farmer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top