Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The headline of the Fox article is misleading in the extreme.
The article Fox cites simply states that he's a disorganized guy -- see the Mail.uk article in the first thread on this topic, and my quote of it above in post 7.
Headline says: 'Climate-gate' Professor Admits No Global Warming Since 1995
In the article it says:
'And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.'
B - Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming
Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level. The positive trend is quite close to the significance level. Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter
Who needs to appreciate statistical significance anyway? That's just one of those tools intellectual elitists use. Can't you see that the weather is changing? That PROVES global warming is real!
The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.
Headline says: 'Climate-gate' Professor Admits No Global Warming Since 1995
In the article it says:
'And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.'
Where is the lie? Misleading in the extreme?
"....he argued [that] this was a blip rather than the long-term trend."
In a long term trend every year is finally "statistically significant."
Guys, don't worry, when the weather turns, the fear mongers will come up with another "man made" crisis. In the 70's it was that we were causing the next ice age after a few cold winters, in the 80's and early 90's acid rain and the ozone layer were the big buzz words to gain political power. Global warming took root longer than most of the others, but it seems to be dying a natural death. I have little doubt that something else will be brought up next.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.