Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Pregnancy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2013, 08:46 AM
 
2 posts, read 2,115 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

I feel you, I am 43 years old and want a baby so bad, I hate mother'sday it is so painful. I have been trying for 7 years, I got married young and went to college, and thought everything was fine, and found out i could not get pregnant, did IVF, Art etc.. We cannot afford to adopt. We are trusting the LORD for our mircle. I know some people think you are in your 40 give it up. I said no I want a baby and ny-sayer can get lost.

Bring70

Last edited by bring70; 05-07-2013 at 08:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2013, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Usa
1,961 posts, read 4,391,652 times
Reputation: 2781
I am 38 and had my children at 35 and 37 (twins). I do not consider myself "too old" and have more energy than most parents 10 -15 years younger than me. I would love to have one more child, but will probably wait 2 years. For me personally, 40 would be the cut off, but that is just me selfishly not wanting to be changing diapers forever.

I see nothing wrong with moms having children when they are 42, 43.

And the person who commented about the fertility treatments - many people use fertility treatments at many ages (not just "older" women). So that comment is just insensitive, and plain wrong - seriously, who are you to judge who should and should not be able to have children.

I used IVF to conceive my twins. I did it to avoid passing on a serious genetic condition. Every individual has their reasons for needing fertility treatments, and I am so grateful that we can now help people have families who want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Southlake. Don't judge me.
2,885 posts, read 4,654,458 times
Reputation: 3781
I know this is an old thread that's been resurrected, but FWIW, we had our child when my wife was 45, "naturally" (no fertility treatments or whatever, only supplement was Folic Acid daily). Obviously we were fortunate, and our daughter is just fine other than being stuck with half of my genes.

Yes, in some ways it would be better if we'd had her years earlier, but on the other hand there are advantages to having a child when we're "older". Really, it varies from person to person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Florida
861 posts, read 1,458,930 times
Reputation: 1446
After 27 for your first child and 35-40 for your 2nd or more pregnancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 02:23 PM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,747,690 times
Reputation: 26861
I know of a woman who recently had a baby at 57. She and her husband have 5 other kids, ranging in age from 20's to 13.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,529,448 times
Reputation: 19007
It's all about the individual. Personally, my cut off was 35. I definitely would not have children over 40.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 05:22 AM
 
Location: New England
3,848 posts, read 7,977,418 times
Reputation: 6002
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
It's all about the individual. Personally, my cut off was 35. I definitely would not have children over 40.
I feel anything after 30 I'd too old for me. My husband had a vasectomy at 30. We had our daughter at 27.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 01:05 PM
 
Location: CT
249 posts, read 355,698 times
Reputation: 119
I didn't meet my husband until I was 30. We married when I was 32 and had our first child when I was 36 and our second when I was 38. I don't think we'll have anymore though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2013, 02:12 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 1,685,330 times
Reputation: 1327
Quote:
Originally Posted by L.K. View Post
Also,because I had all my kids after 40,I was shown those statistics on down syndrome.But then they translated them for me into percentages,and when it is done that way,it is not quite so scary.I'm not good at math[or remembering things]so I couldn't tell you what they were.But for instance,where it says at 46 your chances are 1/20 of having a Down syndrome child,that still means obviously percentage wise,the chances are good you will have a normal child.
Anyway,for me it wasn't like I was just intentionally waiting until 40 to have kids.I didn't marry til 38.Thank God I waited for Mr Right instead of all those frogs I dated[several of whom are now divorced!
I am so glad to hear about someone who had kids at an older age. I am 33 and do desire kids and a family. The problem is that I haven't met Mr. Right yet. I always worry that my time is running out and have recently started thinking I should just settle for someone so I can have kids. Your post has given me a little peace about things. I actually have taken good care of myself and feel better now than I did when I was in my 20s. Most people don't think I am 33 and I have been hit on by young college students because I look young.

I do have one relative with DS, but the mother had her when she was in her 20s. I also have another relative who had a healthy baby at 48. She thought she couldn't have kids so she never used birth control. I guess health problems happen at any age and healthy babies are born at any age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2013, 02:23 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,180,843 times
Reputation: 22700
Quote:
Originally Posted by gimme it View Post
Curious what you think? 35? 40? 45?
Both of my grandmothers were 44 when they had my mother and father. I have known people who have gotten pregnant as old as 46, so I would say 50 is probably the cut off.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Pregnancy

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top